November 17, 2002

DOES ANYONE EDIT THE NYRB?:

Pakistan on the Edge (Ahmed Rashid, October 10, 2002, NY Review of Books)
September 11 was a defining moment throughout the world, but all the more so in South and Central Asia. While the US and its allies can claim success in their quick military victory against the Taliban and al-Qaeda forces in Afghanistan and in the creation of a new government in Kabul, the Western coalition has been much less successful in dealing with the problems that afflict the region today.

Afghanistan is still a dangerous place. On September 5, there was an attempt to assassinate President Hamid Karzai in Kandahar a few hours after an explosion in Kabul that killed at least twenty-five people. The Taliban and al-Qaeda were among the suspects in both cases. Sporadic terrorist attacks on US forces in the country continue. Nine months after he took office last December, President Karzai is still unable to extend his authority across the country; and he has not been able to control the warlords outside the capital, who grow stronger and more defiant of central authority day by day. Donald Rumsfeld reflected the strangely disconnected attitude of the Bush administration when he described the situation as getting better but admitted that it is still "untidy," and that it "will take time and effort for the government to find its sea legs." That Afghanistan is landlocked and most Afghans have never seen the sea does not seem to have occurred to him.


Mr. Rashid's point here is worse than petty and pedantic, it's asinine. The implication is that it would be factually correct to speak of a new government in Iceland, which is an island and where most have seen the Atlantic, as finding its "sea legs", as if the nation were adrift and rocking in the waves. Nitwit. Posted by Orrin Judd at November 17, 2002 11:22 AM
Comments

Just so. But if the important point is whether

Afghanistan is capable of stable national

government; perhaps, whether it is even a

nation, then Rashid is on to something.



Afghanistan is obviously better off with

American minders than on its own. That would

be true of any Moslem country. But does that

give it a future? No.

Posted by: Harry at November 17, 2002 1:24 PM

I think Mr. Rashid has no idea Rumsfeld's "sea legs" is a metaphor. Maybe he thinks it's some term for geography, like "a stretch of land that reaches to the sea" or something.

Posted by: JackSheet at November 17, 2002 6:16 PM

Well, then he doesn't know "insert your name here". And the answer to mt original question would apparently be: "No, no one edits the NYRB".

Posted by: oj at November 17, 2002 7:23 PM

Ahmed Rahid's been covering Central Asia for the past twenty years (mostly writes for the Far Eastern Economic Review) and is a pretty smart man.



I'm sure he realised the meaning of Rumsfield's metaphor and was just making a point about the average American's rather poor grasp of world geography.



There's also the fact he's a long-time observer of US political activity and has historically found it quite disappointing and short-sighted.

Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at November 17, 2002 9:36 PM

O, really? Whose does he like?

Posted by: Harry at November 18, 2002 7:58 PM

Nobody's.

Posted by: M Ali Choudhury at November 19, 2002 6:12 PM
« LET US REASON TOGETHER: | Main | HERBERT HOOVER--FATHER OF THE NEW DEAL: »