November 20, 2002
AXE WORTHY:
Axworthy says Bush will lose terror war: Ex-minister says U.S. reversion to 'law of the jungle' is immoral, ineffective (Randy Boswell, November 20, 2002, The Ottawa Citizen)Lloyd Axworthy will deliver a blistering critique of the U.S.-led war on terrorism tonight at Carleton University, casting the with-us-or-against-us "Bush doctrine" and the unrelenting push for war with Iraq as a reversion to "the law of the jungle" on a global scale.In a speech titled Canadian Foreign Policy: Choices and Consequences, the former foreign affairs minister bluntly predicts the failure of the military campaign against al-Qaeda fanatics and warns that "counter-terrorism is the new crusade" that effectively gives the United States "the right to be judge, jury and prosecutor against any country, or anyone it considers a threat, running contrary to half a century of international law and the Charter of the United Nations." [...]
"Attempting to beat terrorists into submission through military action cannot be effective," Mr. Axworthy states.
"There are too many pre-existing tensions, which military attacks exacerbate rather than quell. Military responses feed the anger, poverty, rhetoric -- the climate of grievance -- that create and sustain terrorist intentions."
And he depicts Canada as facing a historic choice between junior partnership in an emerging American empire or committing itself more resolutely to the multilateral agencies and structures that offer a counterweight -- based on international law and treaties -- to tyranny and terrorism but also to U.S. political, economic and military might.
How is declaring yourself a counterweight to American interests different than saying you're against us? Posted by Orrin Judd at November 20, 2002 12:12 PM
Please, we should never forget, the jungle is exactly where we are.
Does anyone suppose the soldiers in the Vietnam jungles felt immoral in opposing the Viet Cong in the strongest possible manner? Have we all not witnessed the mother protecting her babies, when threatened in manner too vulgur to describe.
Oh, ok, we are sorry for putting our towers in front of those planes. We won't do it again.
How can this weaker version of Jimmy Carter be taken seriously, by anyone?
Chris Patten has been declaring similar intentions. What with his connections and his doggedness, he'd be quite effective, if he weren't so clumsy at it.
Posted by: David Ross at November 21, 2002 12:03 AM