February 23, 2004
YOU MAY RECALL, WE ROOTED FOR THE PINKERTONS (via ef brown):
As jobs vanish, U.S. is an agricultural colony (Pat Buchanan, Feb. 20, 2004, San Jose Mercury News)
Sen. John Edwards did not win Wisconsin, but he closed a huge gap with John Kerry with astonishing speed in the final week.The issue propelling Edwards was jobs, the lost jobs under George Bush, and Edwards' attribution of blame for the losses on NAFTA and the trade deals for which John Kerry voted in Congress.
Edwards has plugged into an issue that could cost Bush his presidency. [...]
To neoconservatives of the Wall Street Journal school, these trade numbers are yardsticks of their success at creating a global economy and measures of their triumph in championing NAFTA and the World Trade Organization. To the Old Right, however, manufacturing was a critical component of American power, indispensable to our sovereignty and independence, and the access road for working Americans into the middle class.
Ha! To the Old Right, industrial workers and their union representatives were the hordes of Satan and Stalin, trying to destroy capital, capitalists, and capitalism. Or, alternatively, to the Agrarians, industrialization itself was the problem with the country. It's fine for these guys to fret about trade now, but after forty years of advocating crushing unions--anyone remember the PATCO strike, Mr. Buchanan?--these crocodile tears are just ludicrous. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 23, 2004 09:23 PM
Although the US should certainly retain an industrial base, manufacturing has no Holy properties which would preclude us from shipping most of these fairly undesirable jobs overseas.
Let us design and market the gizmos, and the Africans can make 'em.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at February 23, 2004 10:00 PMI'm all for the US farming out our weaponry needs.
In 2015, when we need new warplanes, we can just buy them from China, Russia, and the remnants of the Taliban. After all, we're rich enough!
Posted by: John J. Coupal at February 23, 2004 10:44 PMWell, as it turns out, the US could do much worse than buying AK-47 knockoffs from the Czechs.
Also, the basic idea and design for the M1 Abrams' armor, (the most successful design in tank history), came from the UK.
The Army's stupid black berets are, in part, made in China.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at February 24, 2004 02:52 AM"The Army's stupid black berets are, in part, made in China"
So are many critical parts for the Army's fleet of trucks,a fact the had the Pentagon in quite a sweat in '91.
"Although the US should certainly retain an industrial base, manufacturing has no Holy properties which would preclude us from shipping most of these fairly undesirable jobs overseas."
Undesirable to whom?
In the early 1930's some fairly bright individuals in Britain pointed out that their wealthy country could import all the food it needed,so why not turn the nation's farms into parks and nature preserves.After all,who really wanted to muck about on a nasty,dirty farm?
Unappealing and unhygienic,wot?The smell,you know,quite appalling,really.
Fortunatly for Britain,less intellegent and sophisticated people did not agree,so Britain did not starve in 1940-43 during the U-Boat siege.
Posted by: M at February 24, 2004 06:54 AMM1 tank: Both main guns its used also came from other countries. The 105mm from Britain and the 120mm from West Germany. Even the 7.62mm machine gun on it came from Belgium.
Posted by: rps at February 24, 2004 07:22 AMrps: I said China, Russia, and the Taliban.
Belgium is a nominal ally. Britain is definitely one, and I don't know about Germany.
It all depends on WHICH country does the suppling.
We must not depend on enemies to provide us with our war materiel.
Posted by: John J. Coupal at February 24, 2004 09:34 AMO.J.,
You either belive in the preservation of the American nation or you don't. Counting on the continued civilizing of countries like China and India seems like a weak plank to rest the future of our nation.
Posted by: J.H. at February 24, 2004 09:44 AMJH:
If the future of America lies in assembling toys then it isn't worth preserving. Let the cheap labor of the uncivilized world do such tasks.
Posted by: oj at February 24, 2004 09:50 AMM:
I assume that you enjoy working at a boring, repetitive job, often performed in dangerous surroundings ?
As for agriculture, the US spent the entire 20th century both reducing the number of people employed in the field and increasing output.
Jolly good, wot ?
Michael:
M. dreams of having his kids grow up to pick the lettuce he has for dinner--that'll keep us a great nation.
Posted by: oj at February 24, 2004 11:18 AM"M1 tank: Both main guns its used also came from other countries. The 105mm from Britain and the 120mm from West Germany. Even the 7.62mm machine gun on it came from Belgium. "
Many of these items are manufactured in the US under license from the original manufacturer. The Abram's 120 mm gun is manufactured this way.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 24, 2004 12:44 PM"M. dreams of having his kids grow up to pick the lettuce he has for dinner--that'll keep us a great nation."
No,OJ,that's your plan.
"I assume that you enjoy working at a boring, repetitive job, often performed in dangerous surroundings ?
As for agriculture, the US spent the entire 20th century both reducing the number of people employed in the field and increasing output.
Jolly good, wot ?"
Not especially,but it beats idle poverty from lack of jobs and social dysfuntion by those denied a productive role in society,wot?
"Many of these items are manufactured in the US under license from the original manufacturer. The Abram's 120 mm gun is manufactured this way."
Robert,don't confuse them.
As for free trade,well,since we won't be making anything,what,exactly will we be trading?
And what will OJ do with all his new parishoners?
Ideas
Posted by: oj at February 24, 2004 07:18 PMM:
Poverty in today's America isn't caused by a widespread lack of jobs.
If there were teeming hordes desperate for employment, manufacturing jobs would pay the minimum wage, and none would be outsourced.
The example that Robert gives, of equipment being manufactured in the US under license from foreign manufacturers, is a perfect example of what the US sells to the rest of the world.
We design it, they build it.
More like - we order it, they design it, we build it.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 25, 2004 11:10 PMRobert:
Yes, I wasn't clear enough: Just as we manufacture the items in your example, so too does the US license foreign manufacturers to build what we've designed, and will do so increasingly in the future.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at February 26, 2004 12:58 AM