May 8, 2015
OUR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS:
The Trans-Pacific Partnership is about more than trade (Daniel W. Drezner, May 7, 2015, Washington Post)
The security effects of free-trade agreements can be significant -- indeed, one could argue that this was the most important thing about the North American Free Trade Agreement, the deal that has caused DeLong such existential angst. It's worth remembering that prior to NAFTA, Mexico had a ... let's say "fraught" relationship with the United States. NAFTA made it clear to U.S. policymakers that Mexico was now a key partner and merited treatment as such. Which is why the United States helped Mexico in the mid-1990s and during the 2008 financial crisis. And the lock-in effects of NAFTA also helped Mexico transition from a one-party-dominated state to a true multiparty democracy.But the Trans-Pacific Partnership is not NAFTA. President Obama and his army of op-ed allies have made the case for TPP as a means to advance U.S. interests while preventing China from writing the rules of the game in the Pacific Rim. And generally speaking, TPP is an intrinsic part of Obama's rebalancing strategy. One obvious bonus is that it would send a reassurance signal for its East Asian signatories, including Malaysia, Vietnam and Japan.
Posted by Orrin Judd at May 8, 2015 11:40 AM
Tweet