March 17, 2013

THE SORT OF FOLK WHO THINK WE FOUGHT WWII TO AVENGE PEARL HARBOR:

Iraq war: Lessons learned? (Doyle McManus, March 17, 2013, LA Times)

Ten years have passed since the United States invaded Iraq, a decision that almost everyone now ranks as one of the worst foreign policy blunders of our time. Why "almost"? Former President George W. Bush and his top aides still maintain that the invasion was a good idea, even though the premise on which the war was based -- that Saddam Hussein had acquired weapons of mass destruction -- proved false, and even though the ensuing war claimed the lives of more than 4,500 Americans and an estimated 127,000 Iraqis.

The debate over what went wrong -- which is also a debate over who deserves blame -- is still under way. Was it bad intelligence? Bad policymaking? A spineless Congress? Insufficiently skeptical media? Or, most likely, all of the above?

But the more important question for the future is this: Have we learned enough from the experience to make a difference the next time?

It's bad enough that the argument of Mr. McManus and his ilk is wrong on its own terms--Wikileaks and other sources having revealed the WMD that were found in Iraq.

More importantly, their argument is wrong in historical terms--we didn't fight the war over WMD, but rather to depose Saddam and liberate the people of Iraq.  There was even a hope--much scoffed at then--that such a liberation would unleash sufficient unrest among other captive peoples in the Islamic world to bring down other rotten regimes and liberate more Muslims. 

Understood in these -- George W. Bush's -- terms, the war was a spectacular success.  Let us name some of the places where the reverberations were felt: Indonesia, Turkish Kurdistan, Shi'a Lebanon, Palestine, Liberia, Somalia, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt...

Contra the Realists, the singular lesson of the Iraq War is that at extraordinarily little cost we can destabilize large regions to the extent that their peoples will have the spiritual motivation and the political room to assert their own God-given rights.

Happily for everyone--not least the McManus-like isolationists--there are precious few regions left where the lesson needs to be applied.  Arguably, the only obvious place where we are morally obligated to put what we learned into effect is North Korea, where removing the world's worst regime would destabilize the PRC.  We can not do so quickly enough. 


MORE:
A Historian's Take on Islam Steers U.S. in Terrorism Fight : Bernard Lewis's Blueprint -- Sowing Arab Democracy -- Is Facing a Test in Iraq (Peter Waldman, February 3, 2004, The Wall Street Journal)

Call it the Lewis Doctrine. Though never debated in Congress or sanctified by presidential decree, Mr. Lewis's diagnosis of the Muslim world's malaise, and his call for a U.S. military invasion to seed democracy in the Mideast, have helped define the boldest shift in U.S. foreign policy in 50 years. The occupation of Iraq is putting the doctrine to the test.

For much of the second half of the last century, America viewed the Mideast and the rest of the world through a prism shaped by George Kennan, author of the doctrine of "containment." In a celebrated 1947 article in Foreign Affairs focused on the Soviet Union, Mr. Kennan gave structure to U.S. policy in the Cold War. It placed the need to contain Soviet ambitions above all else.

Terrorism has replaced Moscow as the global foe. And now America, having outlasted the Soviets to become the sole superpower, no longer seeks to contain but to confront, defeat and transform. How successful it is at remolding Iraq and the rest of the Mideast could have a huge impact on what sort of superpower America will be for decades to come: bold and assertive — or inward, defensive and cut off.

As mentor and informal adviser to some top U.S. officials, Mr. Lewis has helped coax the White House to shed decades of thinking about Arab regimes and the use of military power. Gone is the notion that U.S. policy in the oil-rich region should promote stability above all, even if it means taking tyrants as friends. Also gone is the corollary notion that fostering democratic values in these lands risks destabilizing them. Instead, the Lewis Doctrine says fostering Mideast democracy is not only wise but imperative.




Posted by at March 17, 2013 9:02 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« FUNCTIONING MARKETS DEPEND ON GOVERNMENT TO SET THE TERMS OF THE COMPETITION: | Main | DIVISION OF LABOR: »