December 27, 2012
Flournoy for SecDef : Ten reasons the president should ditch Chuck for Michèle. (ROSA BROOKS | DECEMBER 26, 2012, Foreign Policy)
Posted by Orrin Judd at December 27, 2012 9:44 AM6. She has a vision of where the department needs to go.Unlike Secretary Panetta, a generalist who was brought in as a transitional secretary to help the department through an election year and a tough budget season, Flournoy would come to the job as someone who has spent her whole career in defense policy. She has a deep understanding of how the security environment has changed over the past decades and the ways in which the United States will need to adapt. We'll be facing high-end asymmetric threats at the same time we'll be dealing with the "low end" consequences of state weakness and instability. We'll need to invest in increasing our agility: We'll need to be able to respond to advanced anti-access and area denial technologies, and we'll need to help partner states counter terrorist insurgencies. We'll also need to respond to the challenges that will be produced by climate change and similar dispersed, inchoate phenomena, and this will require us to build the capacity of allies, partners, and the international system.Flournoy also understands that change will need to occur during a period of extreme fiscal constraint. She knows where the department's lean and where there's fat. She knows what can safely be cut and where we need to invest. Under Flournoy, strategy would drive budget, not the other way around.
« TOO BUSY MAINSTREAMING DEVIANCE TO RECOGNIZE THE DAMAGE: | Main | SHE JUST GOT TRAPPED IN A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION: »