October 10, 2012
IMAGINE THE JUSTIFIED OUTRAGE...:
The Key Question the State Department Won't Answer on Libya (JOHN HUDSON, 10/10/12, The Atlantic)
The investigation surrounding the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Libya is not so much about what happend in the war-torn country, but why it took the Obama administration so long to tell the truth about what happened. Today, a hearing at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee attempted to wring an answer out of State Department officials on that issue, but failed to elicit a robust answer.By now, everyone admits that the State Department and the White House disseminated inaccurate information in the aftermath of the deadly attack. They said the attack derived from a demonstration outside the U.S. compound in Benghazi that devolved into a deadly assault on the building. Now officials say it was a pre-planned attack with probable ties to Al Qaeda. What's more, they also say there was never a demonstration outside the U.S. compound. That makes this question very simple: Who created the myth that a demonstration ever existed?Last night, we came closer to that answer when senior State Department officials told reporters that State was not responsible for creating the bogus intelligence. "That was not our conclusion," the officials said. "That is the question you'd have to ask others."If the intelligence didn't come from the State Department, who did it come from?
...if a Republican president had tried blaming a terrorist attack on average Arabs protesting US policies?
Posted by Orrin Judd at October 10, 2012 8:59 PM
Tweet
« WHERE WOULD HIGH DEMOCRATIC TURNOUT COME FROM?: |
Main
| THE LOANS WERE FINE, IT'S THE DERIVATIVES THAT WERE FRAUDULENT: »