August 14, 2012

FOR THE SAME REASON THEY READ FIFTY SHADES...:

Why Is There No Liberal Ayn Rand? : American conservatives have a canon. Why don't American liberals? (Beverly Gage|Posted Monday, Aug. 13, 2012, Slate)

Ask Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan how he became a conservative and he'll probably answer by citing a book. It might be Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. Or perhaps he'll come up with Friedrich Hayek's Road to Serfdom, or even Barry Goldwater's Conscience of a Conservative. All of these books are staples of the modern conservative canon, works with the reputed power to radicalize even the most tepid Republican. Over the last half-century, they have been vital to the conservative movement's success--and to liberalism's demise.

We tend to think of the conservative influence in purely political terms: electing Ronald Reagan in 1980, picking away at Social Security, reducing taxes for the wealthy. But one of the movement's most lasting successes has been in developing a common intellectual heritage. Any self-respecting young conservative knows the names you're supposed to spout: Hayek, Rand, Ludwig von Mises, Albert Jay Nock. There are some older thinkers too--Edmund Burke, for instance--but for the most part the favored thinkers come out of the movement's mid-20th century origins in opposition to Soviet communism and the New Deal.

Liberals, by contrast, have been moving in the other direction over the last half-century, abandoning the idea that ideas can be powerful political tools.  

...liberalism is female.
Posted by at August 14, 2012 5:11 AM
  
blog comments powered by Disqus
« WE'RE GONNA NEED MORE BEEMAN'S: | Main | AND THE PEOPLE WILL FOLLOW THEIR MONEY: »