May 13, 2012

AMORPHOUSNESS IS THE BEST STRATEGY:

Is There a Romney Doctrine? (DAVID E. SANGER, 5/12/12, NY Times)

[W]hen pressed on how, exactly, his strategy would differ from Mr. Obama's, Mr. Romney had a hard time responding. The economic sanctions Mr. Obama has imposed have been far more crippling to the Iranian economy than anything President Bush did between the public revelation of Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities in 2003 and the end of Mr. Bush's term in early 2009. Covert action has been stepped up, too. Mr. Bolton has called efforts to negotiate with Iran "delusional," but other advisers -- mostly those who dealt with the issue during the Bush administration -- say they are a critical step in holding together the European allies and, if conflict looms, proving to Russia and China that every effort was made to come to a peaceful resolution. Several e-mails to the campaign asking for Mr. Romney's position on the talks yielded no response.

"There are two very different worldviews in this campaign," said one adviser who aligns more often with Mr. Bolton. "But as in any campaign, there are outer circles, inner circles and inner-inner circles, and I'm not sure that anyone knows if the candidate has a strong view of his own on this." Another adviser, saying he would be "cashiered" if the campaign caught him talking to a reporter without approval, said the real answer was that "Romney doesn't want to really engage these issues until he is in office" and for now was "just happy to leave the impression that when Obama says he'll stop an Iranian bomb he doesn't mean it, and Mitt does."

He won't differ from the UR any more than the UR has from W.  You just have to pretend that you'll be different so that you appeal to the dissatisfied.

Posted by at May 13, 2012 9:01 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« POLITICAL CORRECTNESS BEING ONE REASON ALL COMEDY IS CONSERVATIVE: | Main | HEAVEN GETS RHYTHM: »