April 28, 2012
WE DON'T OFTEN NOMINATE GUYS LIKE W THOUGH:
I Was Wrong About Dick Cheney . . . : . . . and other lessons I learned from vetting vice-presidential candidates. (KARL ROVE
Choosing a running mate reveals much about the presidential candidate himself. Though still only a candidate, this is his first presidential decision.It is one best made by asking about the skills, philosophy, outlook, work ethic and chemistry of a prospective running mate. Do they have good judgment? Can they be counted on to give their unvarnished opinion? Are they loyal? Who can best help the president govern? In other words, set aside politics. Put governing first.This was brought home to me in 2000, when then-Gov. George W. Bush was strongly leaning toward picking Dick Cheney as his VP. He knew I was opposed and invited me to make the case against his idea. I came to our meeting armed with eight political objections. Mr. Bush heard me out but with a twist: I explained my objections with Mr. Cheney sitting, mute and expressionless, next to the governor.The next day, Mr. Bush called to say I was right. There would be real political problems if he chose Mr. Cheney. So solve them, he said. Politics was my responsibility. His job was different: to select his best partner in the White House and a person the country would have confidence in if something terrible happened to him. The country was better served by Mr. Bush's decision than by my advice.There's a lesson there for Mr. Romney. Choose the best person for the job. Leave the politics to the staff.
The nominee is often more likely to pick someone you can't imagine as president, so as not to feel threatened, which is why it is so often a legislator instead of an executive. Consider Joe Biden.Posted by Orrin Judd at April 28, 2012 6:50 AM
« GIVEN THAT THE LONGBOW GAVE US OUR REPUBLIC...: | Main | THE POINT OF POST-WAR POLICY WAS TO DESTROY EUROPE...IT WORKED: »