December 26, 2011

WHICH IS WHY THE UR IS THE TEA PARTY CANDIDATE:

Obama: The conservative in 2012 (E.J. Dionne Jr., 12/26/11, Washington Post)

For the first time since Barry Goldwater made the effort in 1964, the Republican Party is taking a run at overturning the consensus that has governed U.S. political life since the Progressive era.

Obama is defending a tradition that sees government as an essential actor in the nation's economy, a guarantor of fair rules of competition, a countervailing force against excessive private power, a check on the inequalities that capitalism can produce, and an instrument that can open opportunity for those born without great advantages.

Today's Republicans cast the federal government as an oppressive force, a drag on the economy and an enemy of private initiative. Texas Gov. Rick Perry continues to promise, as he did last week during a campaign stop in Davenport, Iowa, to be a president who would make "Washington, D.C., as inconsequential in your life as he can make it." That far-reaching word "inconsequential" implies a lot more than trims in budgets or taxes.

The GOP is engaged in a wholesale effort to redefine the government help that Americans take for granted as an effort to create a radically new, statist society. Consider Romney's claim in his Bedford speech: "President Obama believes that government should create equal outcomes. In an entitlement society, everyone receives the same or similar rewards, regardless of education, effort and willingness to take risk. That which is earned by some is redistributed to the others. And the only people who truly enjoy any real rewards are those who do the redistributing -- the government."

The candidates have fallen into the sort of End it Don't Mend It nonsense that makes them seem repealers rather than reformers.  But the winner can easily pivot back to running as a governor.

Posted by at December 26, 2011 9:51 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« BUSH LITE: | Main | SCRATCH A LIBERTARIAN...: »