October 1, 2011

THE POINT OF THE FABLE THOUGH...:

'Soft' Nation (Mark Steyn, 10/01/11, National Review)


The most dismal thing about that David Brooks column conceding that "yes, I'm a sap . . . remember, I'm a sap . . . as you know, I'm a sap" was the headline his New York Times editors chose to append to it: "Obama Rejects Obamaism."

In other words, even in a column remorselessly cataloguing how one of its smartest smart guys had been repeatedly suckered by Obama on jobs, on Medicare, on deficits, on tax reform, etc., the New York Times chose to insist that there is still something called "Obamaism" -- prudent, centrist, responsible -- that for some perverse reason the man for whom this political philosophy is named insists on betraying, 24/7, week in, month out, spring, summer, autumn, tax season. You can set your clock by Obama's rejection of "Obamaism."

That's because there's no such thing. There never was. "Obamaism" was the Emperor's new centrism: To a fool such as your average talk-radio host, His Majesty appears to be a man of minimal accomplishments other than self-promotion marinated in a radical faculty-lounge view of the world and the role of government. But, to a wise man such as your average presidential historian or New York Times columnist, he is the smartest guy ever to become president.

...is that, with the exception of Mr. Obama himself, we all knew the clothes had no Emperor.  Folks like Mr. Brooks weren't saps but something much worse: the bigots of low expectations.



Posted by at October 1, 2011 7:32 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« IF DEMOCRATS HAD REALLY WANTED TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY...: | Main | THAT'S A YOU PROBLEM: »