June 29, 2011

IN THE BEGINNING, GOD WAS BORED:

The Big Nothing (Josh Rothman, June 27, 2011, Boston Globe)

"The separation of Nothing into opposites still needs explanation," Atkins concedes. Still, he writes, "it seems to me that such a process, though fearsomelessly difficult to explain, is less overwhelmingly fearsome than the process of positive, specific, munificent creation." The main point is that the Big Bang doesn't mark, necessarily, the creation of something out of nothing. If that happened at all -- and it may be, Atkins points out, that there was has never been absolutely Nothing, in a total sense -- then it probably happened further back in the pre-cosmological past. Instead, it marks the emergence of texture, differentiation, and particularity out of even, unchanging featurelessness. It's not something out of nothing, but interestingness out of boredom.



Enhanced by Zemanta


Posted by at June 29, 2011 6:17 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« ON THE OTHER HAND...: | Main | GREED IS NOT A CULTURE: »