June 26, 2011

IF ONLY:

There Are No Socialists (Victor Davis Hanson, 6/25/11, Pajamas Media)

He said energy would rightly sky-rocket, given his determination to curb fossil fuel production (cf. “bankrupt” coal companies). Why then is Obama concerned that gas hit $4; is not such a high price a welcomed retardant to burning hot fuels? The higher the gas prices, the more that subsidized wind and solar power, and electric cars are attractive, and thus the more we enjoy “sustainable” power. Right? Am I missing something about this desire within our grasp of “living within our means”?

Obama enjoyed big majorities in both houses of Congress; and on the campaign trail he had promised a de facto amnesty under the euphemism of “comprehensive immigration reform.” So why did he not grant such exemptions, and absorb 11, 15, or 20 million new “citizens” from Oaxaca? Is not that the point of amnesty, to welcome in new constituencies who will remember a benefactor at the polls?


The most effective economic stimulus he could have passed was amnesty, but it's too late now to help his re-election, even though it remains good economic policy.


Posted by at June 26, 2011 8:02 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« WHICH ISN'T A POWER A LAW CAN TAKE AWAY: | Main | A CHANCE TO AVOID BRITAIN'S MISTAKES: »