May 9, 2011

IT'S THE FOUNDERS':

Whose Foreign Policy Is It? (ROSS DOUTHAT, 5/08/11, NY Times)

For those with eyes to see, the daylight between the foreign policies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama has been shrinking ever since the current president took the oath of office. But last week made it official: When the story of America’s post-9/11 wars is written, historians will be obliged to assess the two administrations together, and pass judgment on the Bush-Obama era.

The death of Osama bin Laden, in a raid that operationalized Bush’s famous “dead or alive” dictum, offered the most visible proof of this continuity. But the more important evidence of the Bush-Obama convergence lay elsewhere, in developments from last week that didn’t merit screaming headlines, because they seemed routine rather than remarkable.

One was NATO’s ongoing bombing campaign in Libya, which now barely even pretends to be confined to humanitarian objectives, or to be bound by the letter of the United Nations resolution. Another was Friday’s Predator strike inside Pakistan’s tribal regions, which killed a group of suspected militants while the world’s attention was still fixed on Bin Laden’s final hours. Another was the American missile that just missed killing Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born cleric who has emerged as a key recruiter for Al Qaeda’s Yemen affiliate.


Given, in particular, Reagan's bombing of Qaddafi, GHWB's war with Saddam, etc., the continuity that historians write about will extend far further than two administrations.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted by at May 9, 2011 6:12 AM
  

blog comments powered by Disqus
« SURE, IT'S SYMBOLIC, BUT SYMBOLISM MATTERS: | Main | EVEN WORSE...: »