WHAT DOES AN ACTIVIST COURT CARE....:

Are corporations people? (LA Times, 1/22/11)

In a case that could erect new barriers to public access to government information, the Supreme Court this week was asked to hold that corporations have a right to "personal privacy." Fortunately, justices from across the ideological spectrum appeared skeptical that such a counterintuitive concept could be found either in the law or in a dictionary.

...about law or language? Having pretended that corporations are persons how can they not have personal rights?

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 22, 2011 2:02 PM