October 15, 2010


Reid lost the debate to Angle (Jon Ralston, Oct. 15, 2010, Las Vegas Sun)

Let’s get the easy part out of the way first:

Sharron Angle won The Big Debate.

Angle won because she looked relatively credible, appearing not to be the Wicked Witch of the West (Christine O’Donnell is the good witch of the Tea Party) and scoring many more rhetorical points. And she won because Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid looked as if he could barely stay on a linear argument, abruptly switching gears and failing to effectively parry or thrust.

Whether the debate affects the outcome — I believe very few Nevadans are undecided — it also perfectly encapsulated the race: An aging senator who has mastered the inside political game but fundamentally does not seem to care about his public role (and is terrible at it) versus an ever-smiling political climber who can deliver message points but sometimes changes her message or denies a previous one even existed.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted by Orrin Judd at October 15, 2010 3:26 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« WORTH AT LEAST A YELLOW (via Taegan Goddard): | Main | IT'S JUST COSMETICS: »