August 8, 2010

KIDS-R-US?:

Psychology Studies Biased Toward Western Undergrads:
A recent and exhaustive meta-analysis of scientific data shows that top psychology studies tend to make conclusions about human nature based on samples taken solely from Western undergraduate students. Christie Nicholson, 8/07/10, Scientific American)

[A] group from the University of British Columbia recently published an enormous meta-analysis on the danger of assuming that all of humanity closely matches the behaviors of 20-something college students. They cite evidence that between 2003 and 2007 undergrads made up 80 percent of study subjects in six top psychology journals, and that 96 percent of all psychology samples come from countries that make up only 12 percent of the world’s population. They call this the WEIRD population—Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democratic—and say that they are the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans.

The researchers found huge variability between global populations along measures of motivation, self-perception, reasoning, heritability of IQ and even visual perception. For instance the Muller-Lyer visual illusion, which shows two lines of equal length where one is often perceived at least by American undergrads, as longer than the other, is actually not an illusion at all for the San foragers of the Kalahari. The authors also note points of similarity like this one: in 37 populations males tend to rank physical attractiveness of mates to be more important than do females.

The main plea from the researchers is that far too often these so-called WEIRD populations are actually the "outliers" and psychologists need to be less cavalier about labeling some behavior as human nature based on the desires, emotions and culture of a group of 19-year old co-eds.


Ah, science.

Posted by Orrin Judd at August 8, 2010 7:54 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« SO IT'S GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WTC? SHOCKING....: | Main | TRY CONVINCING FOLKS WHO HAVE ONE: »