August 23, 2010

ACCEPTING FACTS WOULD DEPRIVE US OF OUR EMOTIONWALLOW:

'Ground Zero mosque'? The reality is less provocative: Millions of Americans are furious about the 'Ground Zero mosque'. But it doesn't exist (Charlie Brooker, 8/23/10, The Guardian)

Millions are hopping mad over the news that a bunch of triumphalist Muslim extremists are about to build a "victory mosque" slap bang in the middle of Ground Zero.

The planned "ultra-mosque" will be a staggering 5,600ft tall – more than five times higher than the tallest building on Earth – and will be capped with an immense dome of highly-polished solid gold, carefully positioned to bounce sunlight directly toward the pavement, where it will blind pedestrians and fry small dogs. The main structure will be delimited by 600 minarets, each shaped like an upraised middle finger, and housing a powerful amplifier: when synchronised, their combined sonic might will be capable of relaying the muezzin's call to prayer at such deafening volume, it will be clearly audible in the Afghan mountains, where thousands of terrorists are poised to celebrate by running around with scarves over their faces, firing AK-47s into the sky and yelling whatever the foreign word for "victory" is.

I'm exaggerating. But I'm only exaggerating a tad more than some of the professional exaggerators who initially raised objections to the "Ground Zero mosque". [...]

The "Ground Zero mosque" is a genuine proposal, but it's slightly less provocative than its critics' nickname makes it sound. For one thing, it's not at Ground Zero. Also, it isn't a mosque.

Wait, it gets duller.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted by Orrin Judd at August 23, 2010 5:23 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« IS IT A FETISH IF IT'S UNIVERSAL?: | Main | MORE EVIDENCE THAT CARS ARE ANTI-HUMAN: »