December 21, 2009

WHICH IS WHY BRITAIN BELONGS IN NAFTA, NOT THE EU:

There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government: 'Global' thinking won't necessarily solve the world's problems (Janet Daley, 12/19/09, Daily Telegraph)

The dangerous idea that the democratic accountability of national governments should simply be dispensed with in favour of "global agreements" reached after closed negotiations between world leaders never, so far as I recall, entered into the arena of public discussion. Except in the United States, where it became a very contentious talking point, the US still holding firmly to the 18th-century idea that power should lie with the will of the people.

Nor was much consideration given to the logical conclusion of all this grandiose talk of global consensus as unquestionably desirable: if there was no popular choice about approving supranational "legally binding agreements", what would happen to dissenters who did not accept their premises (on climate change, for example) when there was no possibility of fleeing to another country in protest? Was this to be regarded as the emergence of world government? And would it have powers of policing and enforcement that would supersede the authority of elected national governments? In effect, this was the infamous "democratic deficit" of the European Union elevated on to a planetary scale. And if the EU model is anything to go by, then the agencies of global authority will involve vast tracts of power being handed to unelected officials. Forget the relatively petty irritations of Euro‑bureaucracy: welcome to the era of Earth-bureaucracy, when there will be literally nowhere to run.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 21, 2009 6:44 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« THEY WERE NEVER MORE THAN A BARGAINING CHIP: | Main | THERE ARE NO SAFE SEATS: »