November 16, 2009

WHY ISN'T THE MORALLY SUPERIOR POSITION...:

Obamacare: Buy now, pay later (Robert J. Samuelson, November 16, 2009, Washington Post)

Their far-reaching overhaul of the health-care system -- which Congress is halfway toward enacting -- would almost certainly make matters worse. It would create new, open-ended medical entitlements that threaten higher deficits and would do little to suppress surging health costs. The disconnect between what President Obama says and what he's doing is so glaring that most people could not abide it. The president, his advisers and allies have no trouble. But reconciling blatantly contradictory objectives requires them to engage in willful self-deception, public dishonesty, or both.

The campaign to pass Obama's health-care plan has assumed a false, though understandable, cloak of moral superiority. It's understandable because almost everyone thinks that people in need of essential medical care should get it; ideally, everyone would have health insurance. The pursuit of these worthy goals can easily be projected as a high-minded exercise for the public good.

It's false for two reasons. First, the country has other goals -- including preventing financial crises and minimizing the crushing effects of high deficits or taxes on the economy and younger Americans -- that "health-care reform" would jeopardize. And second, the benefits of "reform" are exaggerated. Sure, many Americans would feel less fearful about losing insurance; but there are cheaper ways to limit insecurity. Meanwhile, improvements in health for today's uninsured would be modest. They already receive substantial medical care. Insurance would help some individuals enormously, but studies find that, on average, gains are moderate. Despite using more health services, people don't automatically become healthier.

The pretense of moral superiority further erodes before all the expedient deceptions used to sell Obama's health-care agenda.


...universal HSAs which would build wealth for the poor rather than make them dependents of the state?

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 16, 2009 7:22 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« YOU MEAN THEIR WORK SHOULD BE USEFUL OUTSIDE THE IVORY TOWER?: | Main | "LIVE EACH DAY AS THOUGH IT WERE YOUR LAST; ONE DAY YOU'RE SURE TO BE RIGHT": »