October 14, 2009

THE ONLY PROBLEM BEING...:

The Value Added Tax (Greg Mankiw, 10/14/09)

From a strictly economic standpoint, a VAT is great. It is essentially a flat consumption tax, like the so-called FairTax, but implemented in a way to reduce compliance problems. Because it is collected in stages along the chain of production, rather than all at the retail level, tax evasion is more difficult.

If you look at the economic effects, a VAT is similar to the Hall-Rabushka Flat Tax, which many economists love. Essentially, the main difference between a VAT and the flat tax as developed by Hall and Rabushka is that firms get to deduct wages as a cost under a flat tax, but then those wages are taxed at the household level. Other than this minor change of shifting the responsibility for the tax on wage income from the firm to the household, the Hall-Rabushka flat tax and VAT have identical economic effects. (There is also an exclusion for the first X thousands of dollars of wage income under Hall-Rabushka, making it progressive in average tax rates, but the same result can be accomplished with a VAT as well by rebating some of the revenue via a demogrant.)

My bottom line: If I could replace our current tax system (including the personal income tax, corporate income tax, payroll tax, and estate tax) with a VAT, I would gladly do it.


...that like withholding taxes from your paycheck, it hides the cost of government. A national sales tax--that was applied in its entirety at the point of final purchase--would make it clearer what we're paying for all those services we demand.

Posted by Orrin Judd at October 14, 2009 6:27 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« IS THIS A HATE CRIME? | Main | WHAT'S THE POINT OF AN ATOMIZING TRAIN? »