August 24, 2009

WOULDN'T IT PROVE...:

Don’t Blame Obama (ROSS DOUTHAT, 8/24/09, NY Times)

In reality, the health care wrestling match is less a test of Mr. Obama’s political genius than it is a test of the Democratic Party’s ability to govern. This is not the Reagan era, when power in Washington was divided, and every important vote required the president to leverage his popularity to build trans-party coalitions. Fox News and Sarah Palin have soapboxes, but they don’t have veto power. Mr. Obama could be a cipher, a nonentity, a Millard Fillmore or a Franklin Pierce, and his party would still have the power to pass sweeping legislation without a single Republican vote.

What’s more, health care reform is the Democratic Party’s signature issue. Its wonks have thought longer and harder about it than any other topic. Its politicians are vastly better at talking about the subject than Republicans: if an election is fought over health care, bet on the Democrat every time. And for all the complexity involved, it’s arguably easier to tackle than other liberal priorities. It’s more popular than cap and trade, it’s less likely to split the party than immigration and it’s more amenable to technocratic interventions than income inequality.

If the Congressional Democrats can’t get a health care package through, it won’t prove that President Obama is a sellout or an incompetent. It will prove that Congress’s liberal leaders are lousy tacticians, and that its centrist deal-makers are deal-makers first, poll watchers second and loyal Democrats a distant third.


...that representational government works and that Democratic Health Care doesn't represent the will of the people?

Posted by Orrin Judd at August 24, 2009 6:48 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« REASON ALONE FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO KEEP HIS JOB: | Main | BOUT OUR NATIVISMN AND CLIMATE HYSTERIA ARE TOTALLY DIFFERENT....: »