August 16, 2009
IF THIS PRESIDENT STANDS FOR ONE THING IT'S BEING LESS AMBITIOUS:
NASA's moon plan too ambitious, Obama panel says (JOEL ACHENBACH, 8/15/09, Washington Post)
NASA doesn't have nearly enough money to meet its goal of putting astronauts back on the moon by 2020 -- and it might be the wrong place to go, anyway. That's one of the harsh messages emerging from a sweeping review of NASA's human space flight program.The Human Space Flight Plans Committee, appointed by President Barack Obama and headed by retired aerospace executive Norman Augustine, has been trying to stitch together some kind of plausible strategy for America's manned space program.
Is Obama's 'let's talk' diplomacy failing?
The US has scored no big wins under his policy of talking with the enemy. Doubts that it can are rising. (Howard LaFranchi, 8/09/09, The Christian Science Monitor )
Whether the issue is key security threats, as with Iran and North Korea, or lower-profile matters, as with Cuba or Burma (Myanmar), Obama's critics and even some backers of the "talk to the enemy" approach are starting to speak of the policy's limits."I'm one who thinks the president is right to pursue this path, but he needs a major success pretty soon to make his case," says Charles Kupchan, a foreign-policy scholar at the Council on Foreign Relations here. "None of these cases is low-hanging fruit, and he doesn't have to score across the board. But without a major success we're going to see the Bush-McCain refrain coming back: that engagement is appeasement."
After the new Deal you get Ike, but he's followed by JFK. After the Gipper, you get GHWB, but he's followed by Clinton/W. And after them you get the UR, but this rentrenchment too will be followed by visionary presidency. Posted by Orrin Judd at August 16, 2009 7:29 AM
