August 21, 2009

IF THEY'RE SO BRIGHT...:

Obama’s Trust Problem (PAUL KRUGMAN, 8/21/09, NY Times)

On the issue of health care itself, the inspiring figure progressives thought they had elected comes across, far too often, as a dry technocrat who talks of “bending the curve” but has only recently begun to make the moral case for reform. Mr. Obama’s explanations of his plan have gotten clearer, but he still seems unable to settle on a simple, pithy formula; his speeches and op-eds still read as if they were written by a committee.

Meanwhile, on such fraught questions as torture and indefinite detention, the president has dismayed progressives with his reluctance to challenge or change Bush administration policy.

And then there’s the matter of the banks.

I don’t know if administration officials realize just how much damage they’ve done themselves with their kid-gloves treatment of the financial industry, just how badly the spectacle of government supported institutions paying giant bonuses is playing. But I’ve had many conversations with people who voted for Mr. Obama, yet dismiss the stimulus as a total waste of money. When I press them, it turns out that they’re really angry about the bailouts rather than the stimulus — but that’s a distinction lost on most voters.

So there’s a growing sense among progressives that they have, as my colleague Frank Rich suggests, been punked.


...why were they as easily fooled by the Organization Man as the Right was? After all, the unwashed mass of voters recognized that he wouldn't do anything to rock the boat. He onlky gets himself in real trouble politically when he threatens to.

Posted by Orrin Judd at August 21, 2009 10:03 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« WHICH SIDE WAS YOUR PARTY ON IN THE WAR, DADDY?: | Main | THIS WEAKNESS DIDN'T JUST SNEAK UP ON THEM: »