July 15, 2009

WHY NOT 0% FOR EVERYONE...:

The 0% Tax Rate Solution: It's better policy, and politics, than the proliferation of tax credits. (PETER FERRARA, 7/15/09, WSJ)

[I]t was primarily Republicans who abolished federal income taxes for the working class and almost abolished them for the middle class. Now Mr. Obama has led enactment of a refundable $400 per worker income tax credit and other refundable credits, which probably leaves the bottom 60% paying nothing as a group on net.

Many conservatives are deeply troubled by this, arguing that everyone should be contributing something to the tax burden. They worry that, not paying for any of the tab, this majority will see no reason not to vote for limitless spending burdens. But are conservatives now going to campaign on increasing taxes on the bottom 60%, arguing that is good tax and social policy? Steve Lonegan recently demonstrated in the New Jersey gubernatorial primary that this is not a viable political position. He proposed a 3% state flat tax which, while very good tax policy, would increase taxes slightly for the bottom half of income earners. His victorious opponent Chris Christie pounded away in advertising on that point.

But what if Republicans proposed a federal tax reform with a 0% income tax rate for the bottom 60% of income earners? With that explicit 0% tax rate framing the issue, abolishing the refundable tax credits that actually ship money to lower income earners through the tax code would become politically viable. Trading an explicit 0% tax rate for the bottom 60% in return for eliminating the refundable tax credits would likely be at least revenue neutral, and probably result in a net increase in revenue.


...and begin the transition to taxing consumption instead of income? Just make the refund to low wage earners less than 100%.

Posted by Orrin Judd at July 15, 2009 8:15 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« OIL FOR FOOD: | Main | ALL THAT'S REQUIRED TO WIN IS THE WILL TO FIGHT: »