April 7, 2009

WHEN NATIVISM "WINS":

The Plus One policy: Japan's rapidly falling population has sparked an anguished debate: should the country open itself up to an influx of immigrant labour or seal its borders and adapt to a new model of economic growth? (Alastair Bonnett, 05 March 2009, New Statesman)

What alarms [deputy chief cabinet secretary, Haku­bun ] Shimomura is that Japanese women have, on average, only 1.3 children each. Today Japan’s fertility average is lower than China’s (with an average of 1.6 children), although not quite as low as Taiwan’s (1.1 children). The corresponding figure for the UK is 1.9; while at the other end of the spectrum, women in Afghanistan, Angola and Liberia have an average of 6.8 children. Since the Japanese have one of the highest life expectancies in the world, the country is facing a withering at one end of the life cycle, but a boom at the other. By 2050, there will be more than three times as many people aged 65 or over as there will be those under 14. It is also predicted that there will be 500,000 ­people aged 100 or over.

The obvious solution is immigration. One can read in the Japan Times of the need to “throw the country open to the millions of poor Asians, Africans and Latin Americans who would certainly come if invited”. However, Japan has no history of being a country of immigration; only about 1.5 per cent of workers are foreign. Even in Tokyo, the figure rises to just

3 per cent. The Japanese myth of racial homogeneity is deep-rooted, insular and very protective. The Japanese look at societies, such as the United States and Britain, where immigrants have settled in large numbers, and see fractured ­societies in which an ill-treated caste of foreign labour fill low-paid jobs. For many, it is not an appealing vision of their own future.


Tom Tancredo ought to run for PM of Japan.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 7, 2009 8:52 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« THEY WERE MORE HUMAN THAN PETER SINGER IS: | Main | NOT THAT ANYONE WOULD EXPECT LAW PROFESSORS TO UNDERSTAND THE CONSTITUTION...: »