April 1, 2009

THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN KNOWING WHAT WORKS AND DOING WHAT WORKS:

Obama’s Ersatz Capitalism (JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ, 4/01/09, NY Times)

Some Americans are afraid that the government might temporarily “nationalize” the banks, but that option would be preferable to the Geithner plan. After all, the F.D.I.C. has taken control of failing banks before, and done it well. It has even nationalized large institutions like Continental Illinois (taken over in 1984, back in private hands a few years later), and Washington Mutual (seized last September, and immediately resold).

What the Obama administration is doing is far worse than nationalization: it is ersatz capitalism, the privatizing of gains and the socializing of losses. It is a “partnership” in which one partner robs the other. And such partnerships — with the private sector in control — have perverse incentives, worse even than the ones that got us into the mess.

So what is the appeal of a proposal like this? Perhaps it’s the kind of Rube Goldberg device that Wall Street loves — clever, complex and nontransparent, allowing huge transfers of wealth to the financial markets. It has allowed the administration to avoid going back to Congress to ask for the money needed to fix our banks, and it provided a way to avoid nationalization.

But we are already suffering from a crisis of confidence. When the high costs of the administration’s plan become apparent, confidence will be eroded further. At that point the task of recreating a vibrant financial sector, and resuscitating the economy, will be even harder.


Of course, politics requires that this pretty standard credit crunch be treated as uniquely difficult to confront, so there's added reason for the UR not to do what everyone knows he needs to do.

Posted by Orrin Judd at April 1, 2009 6:47 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« LIKE BEING A FLY ON THE WALL AT THE WANNSEE CONFERENCE: | Main | SOME? HAVE THE OTHERS NOT READ IT?: »