April 5, 2009

AN EARLY OPPORTUNITY TO GET FOLKS TO TAKE HIM SERIOUSLY:

Poll: Voters back force in N. Korea (HARRY SIEGEL, 4/5/09, Politico)

American voters across lines of age, party and gender support a military approach to eliminate North Korea's nuclear capabilities, according to a Rasmussen Reports survey released Sunday morning — and conducted in the two days prior to North Korea's test missile launch on Saturday.

The poll shows that 57 percent of all voters support such a response, while just 15 percent oppose it. A military response is favored by a majority in both parties — 66 percent of Republicans and 52 percent of Democrats — and by 57 percent of both men and women.


Want to stop proliferation? Attack the proliferators.

MORE:
Barack Obama can't make rogues like North Korea play by his rules: The US President is in no position promise to rid the world of the Bomb (Janet Daley, Apr 2009, Daily Telegraph)

For the one concrete, deliverable promise that Mr Obama made in his Prague "end of nuclear weapons" speech was to continue one of the most unpopular Bush policies: the deployment of the missile defence shield in Europe. So long as Iran remains a threat, he said, the US would maintain its commitment to the missile defence programme which has (he tactfully did not say) been so unpopular in Eastern European countries such as the one in which he was speaking. And the enormous Czech crowd which stretched as far as the eye could see, cheered him. Were they listening carefully? Was his meaning lost in translation? Were the people who could be heard cheering actually Czechs? Well, never mind. He said it – and that is good news. For all the CND blah, there is still a firm grasp of reality – and resolve – at the heart of American foreign and defence policy. Not surprising really when you consider that it has been sub-contracted to Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates who were both supporters of the Bush White House on these matters (Gates having been Bush's Defence Secretary before becoming Mr Obama's).

But the pledge to continue with missile defence strategy was not the only throwback to the previous administration. Mr Obama made it clear that his plan to rid the world of nukes was not wide-eyed or credulous. It would rely, he said, on a system of rigorous inspection to ensure that suspect countries were not breaking the new international rules.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted by Orrin Judd at April 5, 2009 12:37 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« CRIMINALIZED CAPITALISM: | Main | WHERE HAVE YOU GONE, STICK MICHAEL?: »