March 27, 2009
THE FAILURE TO NATIONALIZE LEHMAN DOES NOT AN OLIGARCHY MAKE (via Brad S):
Re-emerging As an Emerging Market (Desmond Lachman, March 29, 2009, Washington Post)
[I] still recall the shock I felt at a meeting in Russia's dingy Ministry of Finance, where I finally realized how a handful of young oligarchs were bringing Russia's economy to ruin in the pursuit of their own selfish interests, despite the supposed brilliance of Anatoly Chubais, Russia's economic czar at the time.At the time, I could not imagine that anything remotely similar could happen in the United States. Indeed, I shared the American conceit that most emerging-market nations had poorly developed institutions and would do well to emulate Washington and Wall Street. These days, though, I'm hardly so confident. Many economists and analysts are worrying that the United States might go the way of Japan, which suffered a "lost decade" after its own real estate market fell apart in the early 1990s. But I'm more concerned that the United States is coming to resemble Argentina, Russia and other so-called emerging markets, both in what led us to the crisis, and in how we're trying to fix it. [...]
The parallels between U.S. policymaking and what we see in emerging markets are clearest in how we've mishandled the banking crisis. We delude ourselves that our banks face liquidity problems, rather than deeper solvency problems, and we try to fix it all on the cheap just like any run-of-the-mill emerging market economy would try to do. And after years of lecturing Asian and Latin American leaders about the importance of consistency and transparency in sorting out financial crises, we fail on both counts: In March 2008, one investment bank, Bear Stearns, is bailed out because it is thought to be too interconnected with the rest of the banking system to fail. However, six months later, another investment bank, Lehman Brothers -- for all intents and purposes indistinguishable from Bear Stearns in its financial market inter-connectedness -- is allowed to fail, with catastrophic effects on global financial markets.
If it is the case, as seems apparent now, that the sources of the credit crisis lie in allowing the creation of derivatives and other devices that were so complex that risk was obscured -- coupled with the Fed once again chasing the dragon of non-existent inflation -- and that the long term solution is to restore transparency while the short term one is to nationalize the banks, it is also the case that we uniquely have strong enough institutions to deal with these problems. Posted by Orrin Judd at March 27, 2009 12:12 PM
