EVEN KILLING THE UNION WILL ONLY SAVE THE JOBS TEMPORARILY:

G.M.’s Troubles Stir Question of Bankruptcy vs. a Bailout (MICHELINE MAYNARD, 11/13/08, NY Times)

[N]ot everyone agrees that a Chapter 11 filing by G.M. would be the disaster that many fear. Some experts note that while bankruptcy would be painful, it may be preferable to a government bailout that may only delay, at considerable cost, the wrenching but necessary steps G.M. needs to take to become a stronger, leaner company.

Although G.M.’s labor contracts would be at risk of termination in a bankruptcy, setting up a potential confrontation with its unions, the company says its pension obligations are largely financed for its 479,000 retirees and their spouses.

Shareholders have already lost much of the equity that would disappear in a bankruptcy case. Shares of G.M. rose 16 cents Wednesday, to $3.08, but they have fallen 90.5 percent over the last 12 months, amid sharply lower auto sales and fears about G.M.’s future.

And as companies in industries like airlines, steel and retailing have shown, bankruptcy can offer a fresh start with a more competitive cost structure to preserve a future for the workers who remain.

You just can't pay the citizens of an advanced economy as little as part assembly is worth.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Low on Cash, GM's Fate Debated
• At GM, the Endgame Begins
• General Motors: end of the road?

Posted by Orrin Judd at November 13, 2008 9:00 AM