January 25, 2004

TONY THE TORY:

Blair falling on sword of education reform?: Under the new system, students would shoulder debt instead of taxpayers. (Margalit Edelman, 1/26/04, CS Monitor)

His support of raising fees for college tuition is, once again, an act of political courage that has earned him the scorn of opposition politicians, his own party, and a wide swath of the British public.

Mr. Blair is seeking parliamentary approval for university funding reforms in a vote tuesday. He seeks higher tuition fees in British public universities, and wants to allow the schools themselves to determine how much to charge, up to a maximum of £3,000 annually. Students would be able to delay payment until they're earning £15,000 annually. The new fees would also finance compulsory bursaries for poor students, and those who never break the salary barrier would have debts written off after 25 years. The "top up" charges would replace the £1,125 annual fee that students now pay up front. Even with students contributing more, general taxation would still pay more than 80 percent of the cost.

To most Americans, Blair's proposal wouldn't seem shocking in an era where parents expect thousands in debt for public and private university education. But transatlantic sensibilities on education, health, and nearly any issue pitting government obligations against taxpayers can be oceans apart.

Many here expect universities to be funded largely by the government through taxation. Three recent polls conducted by British polling firms Populus, YouGov, and ICM all found about a third of respondents supporting tax-based college funding.

Nonetheless, there seems to be growing recognition that students should foot more of the bill. The same polls found that between 40 and 65 percent believe students ought to contribute to their education but agree with Blair's postponed repayment. A majority of respondents on lower rungs of the economic ladder who did not attend university also considered the plan fair.


You have to suppose that those here who continue to think of Tony Blair as a garden variety Leftist just don't understand how radically conservative is what he's trying to do.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 25, 2004 07:04 PM
Comments

You're absolutely right, OJ. Though I'm surprised that there can be anyone out there who could still think that Blair is a "garden variety Leftist".

That the Tories themselves oppose this most Tory-like proposal is unfortunately symptomatic of our (otherwise excellent) confrontational two-party system, where the main thing is not to vote for the right idea, but to cause the other lot to lose.

Incidentally, I can ease your concerns below about the Labour Party reverting to its 'Old Labour' ways. Socialism as a political force is long dead in Britain.

The Tories are experiencing something of a revival and Labour is stuffed with Blair-ites anyway.

The political battleground is really just shades of Blairism/Thatcherism, and the key factor in a politician's success is that they don't look terrible on TV.

Posted by: Brit at January 26, 2004 09:07 AM
« AXIS OF GOOD FILES: | Main | STILL TED'S PARTY: »