December 14, 2003

FACTIONAL FICTIONS:

The Truth About the Spanish Inquisition: Because it was both professional and efficient, the Spanish Inquisition kept very good records. Vast archives are filled with them. These documents are a goldmine for modern historians who have plunged greedily into them. Thus far, the fruits of that research have made one thing abundantly clear - the myth of the Spanish Inquisition has nothing at all to do with the real thing. (Thomas F. Madden, October 2003, Crisis)

The inescapable conclusion is that, by the standards of its time, the Spanish Inquisition was positively enlightened. That was the assessment of most Europeans until 1530. It was then that the Spanish Inquisition turned its attention away from the conversos and toward the new Protestant Reformation. The people of Spain and their monarchs were determined that Protestantism would not infiltrate their country as it had Germany and France. The Inquisition's methods did not change. Executions and torture remained rare. But its new target would forever change its image.

By the mid-16th century, Spain was the wealthiest and most powerful country in Europe. King Philip II saw himself and his countrymen as faithful defenders of the Catholic Church. Less wealthy and less powerful were Europe's Protestant areas, including the Netherlands, northern Germany, and England. But they did have a potent new weapon: the printing press. Although the Spanish defeated Protestants on the battlefield, they would lose the propaganda war. These were the years when the famous "Black Legend" of Spain was forged. Innumerable books and pamphlets poured from northern presses accusing the Spanish Empire of inhuman depravity and horrible atrocities in the New World. Opulent Spain was cast as a place of darkness, ignorance, and evil. Although modern scholars have long ago discarded the Black Legend, it still remains very much alive today. Quick: Think of a good conquistador.

Protestant propaganda that took aim at the Spanish Inquisition drew liberally from the Black Legend. But it had other sources as well. From the beginning of the Reformation, Protestants had difficulty explaining the 15-century gap between Christ's institution of His Church and the founding of the Protestant churches. Catholics naturally pointed out this problem, accusing Protestants of having created a new church separate from that of Christ. Protestants countered that their church was the one created by Christ but that it had been forced underground by the Catholic Church. Thus, just as the Roman Empire had persecuted Christians, so its successor, the Roman Catholic Church, continued to persecute them throughout the Middle Ages. Inconveniently, there were no Protestants in the Middle Ages, yet Protestant authors found them anyway in the guise of various medieval heresies. (They were underground, after all.) In this light, the medieval Inquisition was nothing more than an attempt to crush the hidden, true church. The Spanish Inquisition, still active and extremely efficient at keeping Protestants out of Spain, was for Protestant writers merely the latest version of this persecution. Mix liberally with the Black Legend, and you have everything you need to produce tract after tract about the hideous and cruel Spanish Inquisition. And so they did.

The Spanish people loved their Inquisition. That is why it lasted for so long. It stood guard against error and heresy, protecting the faith of Spain and ensuring the favor of God. But the world was changing. In time, Spain's empire faded away. Wealth and power shifted to the north, in particular to France and England. By the late 17th century, new ideas of religious tolerance were bubbling across the coffeehouses and salons of Europe. Inquisitions, both Catholic and Protestant, withered. The Spanish stubbornly held on to theirs, and for that, they were ridiculed. French philosophers like Voltaire saw in Spain a model of the Middle Ages: weak, barbaric, superstitious. The Spanish Inquisition, already established as a bloodthirsty tool of religious persecution, was derided by Enlightenment thinkers as a brutal weapon of intolerance and ignorance. A new, fictional Spanish Inquisition had been constructed, designed by the enemies of Spain and the Catholic Church.

Because it was both professional and efficient, the Spanish Inquisition kept very good records. Vast archives are filled with them. These documents were kept secret, so there was no reason for scribes to do anything but accurately record every action of the Inquisition. They are a goldmine for modern historians who have plunged greedily into them. Thus far, the fruits of that research have made one thing abundantly clear - the myth of the Spanish Inquisition has nothing at all to do with the real thing.


Those who hate religion are certainly entitled to their myths too.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 14, 2003 07:09 AM
Comments

Looks like we'll have to redefine "inquisition."

Local Catholic neighborhood watch association in 15th-19th C. Iberian peninsula (with branches in other countries and on other continents). Motto: "Keeping our neighborhoods safe."

Posted by: Barry Meislin at December 14, 2003 08:49 AM

"I wasn't expecting the Spanish Inquisition".

"No one expects the Spanish Inquisition."

Posted by: Jeff at December 14, 2003 03:05 PM

It is amusing to watch, at a great distance, the attempts of the religious bigots to excuse their institutions' behavior.

Define "rare" for me. Compared to what?

Madden makes a serious factual error in stating that Spain was then the richest country in Europe. That would have been the Netherlands, governed by -- guess who? -- the Spaniards. Spain was bankrupt and only managed to pay its armies with Netherlandish silver.

The Netherlandish Inquisition -- run by Spaniards -- was inadequate to suppress Protestantism, wasn't it, except partly in Belgium.

The Spanish Inquisition was a murder factory.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 14, 2003 03:09 PM

"By the mid-16th century, Spain was the wealthiest and most powerful country in Europe. King Philip II saw himself and his countrymen as faithful defenders of the Catholic Church. Less wealthy and less powerful were Europe's Protestant areas, including the Netherlands, northern Germany, and England."

And by the mid-20th century Spain was a backwater, as were its former colonies in South America. Why?

Allow me to sugget that the Inquisition and the tyranny it propped up retarded social development in Spain for generations.

Want more proof? Compare southern Italy, oppressed by Spain from the 16th through the 19th centuries, with Northern Italy where the Inquisition held no sway.

Get off this horse OJ, its a loser.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at December 14, 2003 05:04 PM

If Catholicism is so benevolent, what happened to all the Jews in Spain?

Well, whatever it was, because it involved God we can rest assured it was moral.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at December 15, 2003 05:08 PM

They were expelled, the same way we deported Arabs after 9-11. Societies need not tolerate dissent.

Posted by: oj at December 15, 2003 05:14 PM

If you can excuse the Inquisition by saying "societies need not tolerate dissent", you should have no problem with the secular majority societies of Europe today instituting inquisitions against the dissenting believers in their midst, correct? You can excuse a lot with that rule, OJ. There is no need to for any society to strive for objective truth, the almighty Society and its norms will justify all.

Posted by: Robert D at December 15, 2003 07:25 PM

Robert:

They are doing so. France is about to ban religious garb. Pim Fortuyn supported pederasty but wanted to limit Islam. Etc., etc.

I have no problem with European secularists enforcing their own beliefs. They're only dooming themselves. It's no coincidence that the rise of secularism has been exactly paralleled by a decline in Europe's stature.

Good riddance. It will be a better place when the Algerians and Turks inherit the rubble.

Posted by: oj at December 15, 2003 07:34 PM

OJ:
Only the morally blinkered could term the existence of Jews in Spain as a form of dissent. Those would be the same blinkers the Jews have faced everywhere, no matter how much they contributed to the societies within which they live.

Even the conversos, the ones who tried hardest to conform took a beating.

That is some kind of wonderful morality you have there.

Posted by: Jeff Guinn at December 15, 2003 10:07 PM

Jeff:

Judaism casts itself as a race, not a religion per se, and thereby invites racism. That doesn't justifu it, but explains it. In the unending struggle to survive, racial groups fight one another.

Posted by: oj at December 15, 2003 11:06 PM

Actually, we didn't deport Arabs en masse. Only law violators, after due process. Not at all the same as Christians v. the Jews or the Moors.

Anyhow, there are different moralities. Mine doesn't involve slaughtering the innocents. Mine is better.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 15, 2003 11:13 PM

One always thinks one's own ethnic cleansing is justified. Your slaughter of Native Americans, Hawaiians, etc. is notable chioefly by the lack of any compulsion to give the country back.

Posted by: oj at December 15, 2003 11:18 PM

That was the missionaries.

Posted by: Harry Eagar at December 16, 2003 03:07 AM
« NO MAS: | Main | HERE'S A PARADIGM< CALL SOMEONE WHO CARES: »