November 23, 2010

MALENESS AS A DISEASE:

Beyond Understanding (ANDY MARTIN, 11/21/10, NY Times)

My psychologist friend assured me that I was not alone. “Men tend to be autistic on average. More so than women.” The accepted male-to-female ratio for autism is roughly 4-to-1; for Asperger’s the ratio jumps even higher, by some accounts 10-to-1 (other statistics give higher or lower figures but retain the male prevalence). Asperger himself wrote that the autistic mind is “an extreme variant of male intelligence”; Baron-Cohen argues that “the extreme male brain” (not exclusive to men) is the product of an overdose of fetal testosterone.

If Wittgenstein in his conversation with Russell is suggesting that philosophers are typically autistic in a broad sense, this view might explain (in part) the preponderance of male philosophers. I went back over several sources to get an idea of the philosophical ratio: Russell’s “History of Western Philosophy” (about 100-to-1), Critchley’s “Book of Dead Philosophers” (30-to-1), while, in the realm of the living, the list of contributors to The Stone, for example, the ratio narrows to more like 4-to-1.


Perhaps women are no more emnpathetic than men, but are conditioned to fake it? Whereas men generally can't be bothered to even make the effort?

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted by Orrin Judd at November 23, 2010 5:50 AM
blog comments powered by Disqus
« BEST OF THE SEASON, FROM THE BROTHERS AND RANDALL VOTH: | Main | NOT THAT DIFFERENT WORDS WOULD CHANGE THE UNDERLYING TRUTH: »