January 8, 2008

MARSHALL'S MADRASAS:

Europe’s Philosophy of Failure (Stefan Theil, January/February 2008, Foreign Policy)

Millions of children are being raised on prejudice and disinformation. Educated in schools that teach a skewed ideology, they are exposed to a dogma that runs counter to core beliefs shared by many other Western countries. They study from textbooks filled with a doctrine of dissent, which they learn to recite as they prepare to attend many of the better universities in the world. Extracting these children from the jaws of bias could mean the difference between world prosperity and menacing global rifts. And doing so will not be easy. But not because these children are found in the madrasas of Pakistan or the state-controlled schools of Saudi Arabia. They are not. Rather, they live in two of the world’s great democracies—France and Germany.

What a country teaches its young people reflects its bedrock national beliefs. Schools hand down a society’s historical narrative to the next generation. There has been a great deal of debate over the ways in which this historical ideology is passed on—over Japanese textbooks that downplay the Nanjing Massacre, Palestinian textbooks that feature maps without Israel, and new Russian guidelines that require teachers to portray Stalinism more favorably. Yet there has been almost no analysis of how countries teach economics, even though the subject is equally crucial in shaping the collective identity that drives foreign and domestic policies.

Just as schools teach a historical narrative, they also pass on “truths” about capitalism, the welfare state, and other economic principles that a society considers self-evident. In both France and Germany, for instance, schools have helped ingrain a serious aversion to capitalism. In one 2005 poll, just 36 percent of French citizens said they supported the free-enterprise system, the only one of 22 countries polled that showed minority support for this cornerstone of global commerce. In Germany, meanwhile, support for socialist ideals is running at all-time highs—47 percent in 2007 versus 36 percent in 1991.

It’s tempting to dismiss these attitudes as being little more than punch lines to cocktail party jokes. But their impact is sadly and seriously self-destructive. In Germany, unemployment is finally falling after years at Depression-era levels, thanks in no small part to welfare reforms that in 2005 pressured Germans on the public dole to take up jobs. Yet there is near consensus among Germans that, despite this happy outcome, tinkering with the welfare state went far beyond what is permissible.


Brother Cohen is fond of pointing out that if you simply look at America's interest in post-war Europe as being to guarantee that they'd no longer bother us and we'd never again have to intervene in a war there, then all its various pathologies and our encouragement of them must be seen as successes from a purely parochial point of view.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 8, 2008 8:41 AM
Comments

Forget Europe, it's happened in the states too. I had a required humanities class when I was at university. It was called 'the constitution', but the constitution wasn't actually mentioned even once, the class was all about how great socialism is. When I mentioned that socialism wasn't all that great for the tens of millions that it left dead, the prof just scowled at me. Lefties are like pedophiles, they know that adults won't buy what they're selling, so like pederasts they aim for the children.

Posted by: lebeaux at January 8, 2008 11:31 AM

Lebeaux,

OJ is impervious to the reality that our schools in America are no better. (Worse, in that at least in European schools, they learn a few facts and figures)

This is why the American Suburbs are voting and acting more and more like Europeans everyday.

Posted by: Bruno at January 8, 2008 2:10 PM

It's revealing that you couldn't teach such a course in a public primary school. Which is why the Right can't get the middle class to hate the quality education its kids receive.

Posted by: oj at January 8, 2008 4:22 PM
« THE AVIATOR VS THE EMPTY HELMET, PART DEUX: | Main | WHAT A TEAR REVEALS: »