September 23, 2007

KOOK IS AS KOOK DOES:

Death of an Innocent: How Christopher McCandless lost his way in the wilds (Jon Krakauer, January 1993, Outside magazine)

James Gallien had driven five miles out of Fairbanks when he spotted the hitchhiker standing in the snow beside the road, thumb raised high, shivering in the gray Alaskan dawn. A rifle protruded from the young man's pack, but he looked friendly enough; a hitchhiker with a Remington semiautomatic isn't the sort of thing that gives motorists pause in the 49th state. Gallien steered his four-by-four onto the shoulder and told him to climb in.

The hitchhiker introduced himself as Alex. "Alex?" Gallien responded, fishing for a last name.

"Just Alex," the young man replied, pointedly rejecting the bait. He explained that he wanted a ride as far as the edge of Denali National Park, where he intended to walk deep into the bush and "live off the land for a few months." Alex's backpack appeared to weigh only 25 or 30 pounds, which struck Gallien, an accomplished outdoorsman, as an improbably light load for a three-month sojourn in the backcountry, especially so early in the spring. Immediately Gallien began to wonder if he'd picked up one of those crackpots from the Lower 48 who come north to live out their ill-considered Jack London fantasies. Alaska has long been a magnet for unbalanced souls, often outfitted with little more than innocence and desire, who hope to find their footing in the unsullied enormity of the Last Frontier. The bush, however, is a harsh place and cares nothing for hope or longing. More than a few such dreamers have met predictably unpleasant ends.

As they got to talking during the three-hour drive, though, Alex didn't strike Gallien as your typical misfit. He was congenial, seemed well educated, and peppered Gallien with sensible questions about "what kind of small game lived in the country, what kind of berries he could eat, that kind of thing."

Still, Gallien was concerned: Alex's gear seemed excessively slight for the rugged conditions of the interior bush, which in April still lay buried under the winter snowpack. He admitted that the only food in his pack was a ten-pound bag of rice. He had no compass; the only navigational aid in his possession was a tattered road map he'd scrounged at a gas station, and when they arrived where Alex asked to be dropped off, he left the map in Gallien's truck, along with his watch, his comb, and all his money, which amounted to 85 cents. "I don't want to know what time it is," Alex declared cheerfully. "I don't want to know what day it is, or where I am. None of that matters."

During the drive south toward the mountains, Gallien had tried repeatedly to dissuade Alex from his plan, to no avail. He even offered to drive Alex all the way to Anchorage so he could at least buy the kid some decent gear. "No, thanks anyway," Alex replied. "I'll be fine with what I've got." When Gallien asked whether his parents or some friend knew what he was up to--anyone who could sound the alarm if he got into trouble and was overdue--Alex answered calmly that, no, nobody knew of his plans, that in fact he hadn't spoken to his family in nearly three years. "I'm absolutely positive," he assured Gallien, "I won't run into anything I can't deal with on my own."

"There was just no talking the guy out of it," Gallien recalls. "He was determined. He couldn't wait to head out there and get started." So Gallien drove Alex to the head of the Stampede Trail, an old mining track that begins ten miles west of the town of Healy, convinced him to accept a tuna melt and a pair of rubber boots to keep his feet dry, and wished him good luck. Alex pulled a camera from his backpack and asked Gallien to snap a picture of him. Then, smiling broadly, he disappeared down the snow-covered trail. The date was Tuesday, April 28, 1992.

More than four months passed before Gallien heard anything more of the hitchhiker. His real name turned out to be Christopher J. McCandless. He was the product of a happy family from an affluent suburb of Washington, D.C. And although he wasn't burdened with a surfeit of common sense and possessed a streak of stubborn idealism that did not readily mesh with the realities of modern life, he was no psychopath. McCandless was in fact an honors graduate of Emory University, an accomplished athlete, and a veteran of several solo excursions into wild, inhospitable terrain.

An extremely intense young man, McCandless had been captivated by the writing of Leo Tolstoy. He particularly admired the fact that the great novelist had forsaken a life of wealth and privilege to wander among the destitute. For several years he had been emulating the count's asceticism and moral rigor to a degree that astonished and occasionally alarmed those who knew him well. When he took leave of James Gallien, McCandless entertained no illusions that he was trekking into Club Med; peril, adversity, and Tolstoyan renunciation were what he was seeking. And that is precisely what he found on the Stampede Trail, in spades.

For most of 16 weeks McCandless more than held his own. Indeed, were it not for one or two innocent and seemingly insignificant blunders he would have walked out of the Alaskan woods in July or August as anonymously as he walked into them in April. Instead, the name of Chris McCandless has become the stuff of tabloid headlines, and his bewildered family is left clutching the shards of a fierce and painful love.

On the northern margin of the Alaska Range, just before the hulking escarpments of Denali and its satellites surrender to the low Kantishna plain, a series of lesser ridges known as the Outer Ranges sprawls across the flats like a rumpled blanket on an unmade bed. Between the flinty crests of the two outermost Outer Ranges runs an east-west trough, maybe five miles across, carpeted in a boggy amalgam of muskeg, alder thickets, and scrawny spruce. Meandering through this tangled, rolling bottomland is the Stampede Trail, the route Chris McCandless followed into the wilderness.

Twenty or so miles due west of Healy, not far from the boundary of Denali National Park, a derelict bus--a blue and white, 1940s-vintage International from the Fairbanks City Transit System--rusts incongruously in the fireweed beside the Stampede Trail. Many winters ago the bus was fitted with bedding and a crude barrel stove, then skidded into the bush by enterprising hunters to serve as a backcountry shelter. These days it isn't unusual for nine or ten months to pass without the bus seeing a human visitor, but on September 6, 1992, six people in three separate parties happened to visit it on the same afternoon, including Ken Thompson, Gordon Samel, and Ferdie Swanson, moose hunters who drove in on all-terrain vehicles.

When they arrived at the bus, says Thompson, they found "a guy and a girl from Anchorage standing 50 feet away, looking kinda spooked. A real bad smell was coming from inside the bus, and there was this weird note tacked by the door." The note, written in neat block letters on a page torn from a novel by Gogol, read: "S.O.S. I need your help. I am injured, near death, and too weak to hike out of here. I am all alone, this is no joke. In the name of God, please remain to save me. I am out collecting berries close by and shall return this evening. Thank you, Chris McCandless. August?"

The Anchorage couple had been too upset by the implications of the note to examine the bus's interior, so Thompson and Samel steeled themselves to take a look. A peek through a window revealed a .22-caliber rifle, a box of shells, some books and clothing, a backpack, and, on a makeshift bunk in the rear of the vehicle, a blue sleeping bag that appeared to have something or someone inside it.

"It was hard to be absolutely sure," says Samel. "I stood on a stump, reached through a back window, and gave the bag a shake. There was definitely something in it, but whatever it was didn't weigh much. It wasn't until I walked around to the other side and saw a head sticking out that I knew for certain what it was." Chris McCandless had been dead for some two and a half weeks. [...]

When news of McCandless's fate came to light, most Alaskans were quick to dismiss him as a nut case. According to the conventional wisdom he was simply one more dreamy, half-cocked greenhorn who went into the bush expecting to find answers to all his problems and instead found nothing but mosquitoes and a lonely death.

Dozens of marginal characters have gone into the Alaskan backcountry over the years, never to reappear. A few have lodged firmly in the state's collective memory. There is, for example, the sad tale of John Mallon Waterman, a visionary climber much celebrated for making one of the most astonishing first ascents in the history of North American mountaineering--an extremely dangerous 145-day solo climb of Mount Hunter's Southeast Spur. Upon completing this epic deed in 1979, though, he found that instead of putting his demons to rest, success merely agitated them.

In the years that followed, Waterman's mind unraveled. He took to prancing around Fairbanks in a black cape and announced he was running for president under the banner of the Feed the Starving Party, the main priority of which was to ensure that nobody on the planet died of hunger. To publicize his campaign he laid plans to make a solo ascent of Denali, in winter, with a minimum of food.

After his first attempt on the mountain was aborted prematurely, Waterman committed himself to the Anchorage Psychiatric Institute but checked out after two weeks, convinced that there was a conspiracy afoot to put him away permanently. Then, in the winter of 1981, he launched another solo attempt on Denali. He was last placed on the upper Ruth Glacier, heading unroped through the middle of a deadly crevasse field en route to the mountain's difficult East Buttress, carrying neither sleeping bag nor tent. He was never seen after that, but a note was later found atop some of his gear in a nearby shelter. It read, "3-13-81 My last kiss 1:42 PM."

Perhaps inevitably, parallels have been drawn between John Waterman and Chris McCandless. Comparisons have also been made between McCandless and Carl McCunn, a likable, absentminded Texan who in 1981 paid a bush pilot to drop him at a lake deep in the Brooks Range to photograph wildlife. He flew in with 500 rolls of film and 1,400 pounds of provisions but forgot to arrange for the pilot to pick him up again. Nobody realized he was missing until state troopers came across his body a year later, lying beside a 100-page diary that documented his demise. Rather than starve, McCunn had reclined in his tent and shot himself in the head.

There are similarities among Waterman, McCunn, and McCandless, most notably a certain dreaminess and a paucity of common sense. But unlike Waterman, McCandless was not mentally unbalanced. And unlike McCunn, he didn't go into the bush assuming that someone would magically appear to bring him out again before he came to grief.

McCandless doesn't really conform to the common bush-casualty stereotype: He wasn't a kook, he wasn't an outcast, and although he was rash and incautious to the point of foolhardiness, he was hardly incompetent or he would never have lasted 113 days.


In what sens is someone so foolhardy as to make his own death at least not unlikely not a kook?

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 23, 2007 11:07 AM
Comments

I remember this story back then about McCandless and thought he was very idealistic and very naive - which in the wrong environment, can get you killed. It's a sad story and hope it is warning that others need to take heed when working or vacationing in the wild.

Posted by: KRS at September 23, 2007 2:47 PM

I just saw the movie and found it powerful and awesome. Some of the "facts" as represented in the film differ from those in the article above.
One review said the movie was like "nature on steroids." The scenery and animals were incredible!

Posted by: D Judd at September 23, 2007 5:02 PM

The poor man couldn't tell a caribou from a moose and starved to death during the summer in Alaska when he had a rifle and fishing gear. "Kook" might be too mild of a word to describe him.

N.B. - I did a little research after reading this article and the plants that the author and Sean Penn claim poisoned McCandless have been shown to be non-toxic.

Posted by: Patrick H at September 23, 2007 5:15 PM

Patrick H,

You did not read the book. He ate the wrong seeds, drank the kool-aid.

You said:
N.B. - I did a little research after reading this article and the plants that the author and Sean Penn claim poisoned McCandless have been shown to be non-toxic.
------
Educate me.

Posted by: Bonzo at September 23, 2007 5:52 PM

Some of it is on Wikipedia, though that's not where I found it. My original source (I can't find the link) stated that subsequent editions of the book did not reflect the findings, but Wiki states that Krakauer has recently revised his theory, and the latest edition of the book has been revised. He now blames mold on the pods while Penn is going with a different plant in the film.

Posted by: Patrick H at September 23, 2007 7:40 PM

At least civilization hasn't progressed far enough that it can prevent the dreamers from doing things like this. Even though it killed him, his odyssey is the very definition of freedom.

Posted by: Pete at September 23, 2007 7:52 PM

Which is why freedom is a false god.

Posted by: oj at September 23, 2007 9:35 PM

Patrick:

newsminer.com/2007/09/23/9008

Posted by: oj at September 23, 2007 9:54 PM

A false God perhaps, OJ, but we still (theoretically) have the freedom to choose.

I read the book a few years ago. At least this poor sap had the courage of his convictions, which is more than can be said for the rest of over-stimulate, over-medicated, and over-indoctrinated suburbia.

It is the goal of our popular culture and schools make as many as people as possible "non-functional."

MaCandless' was a poor misguided goof, (perhaps with a few loose wires) but he didn't become a Unabomber, a Johnny Lind, nor a Columbine Killer.

Posted by: Bruno at September 23, 2007 10:10 PM

A suicidal freedomism is just as ugly as the rest of the fanatacisms.

Posted by: oj at September 24, 2007 5:49 AM

Should have read a little Jack London first.

Posted by: Rick T. at September 24, 2007 12:33 PM

He should have named himself "Alexander Superjerk". By all accounts (except maybe Sean Penn's) his family are kind, generous, and caring people. Yet this jerk imposed unneeded worry and anguish on them by turning his back on them and disappearing without a trace. My 2 cents.

Posted by: gofer at October 14, 2007 10:16 AM

I am reading the Krakauer book now. I, too, when I was young, toyed with the idea of "roughing it" out in the wild, far from the maddening crowd. I remember practicing making a fire just using sticks and twigs (embellishment alert! I used my shoelaces, too!). I spent a fair number of days camping by myself during college. I was curiously drawn to old Anasazi ruins and could sit for hours in an Anasazi room, imagining life as it must have been so many 100s of years ago. But I have a "weakness" that McCandless didn't seem to have: call me neurotic, but I question myself constantly. Am I doing the right thing? Are things really as bad/good as they seem? Are my plans realistic? After "coming to my senses", getting a normal job (CPA, arrrrgh!), being married unhappily for 17 years, I finally decided changing was worth the risk. I am happy in my new life in a foreign country. I now teach small children English. What bothers me about McCandless was that he didn't have the ability to change. Okay, yes, striking out into the wilderness takes courage, but he had been doing this for a long time. The book has many interviews with people who ran into him along his journey to that bus in Alaska. They almost all describe a man near starvation, with an incurable "wanderlust", oblivious to the pain he was inflicting on his body (and the mental pain he was inflicting on his family and the many friends he made along the way). He "impressed" everyone with his single-mindedness, obsession and absolute certainty that he was "right" and everyone else was wrong. That fits the definition of man who has lost a crucial ability: to question himself. Yes, too much questioning of oneself is stifling and oppressive, but I think having too much "courage of one's convictions" is not always a good thing. Has anyone noticed the similarity in the Unibomber's mindset? He also lived in a cabin in the wilderness, but his single-mindedness eventually led to violence. Allright this is a little extreme, but the suicide bombers in Iraq have the "courage of their convictions". Is that a good thing? Last word from me: one must be able to question oneself and be able to change.

Posted by: Stan S. at November 16, 2007 7:56 AM
« HIS VALUES AREN'T THEIRS: | Main | IF THERE'S ONE THING WE KNOW ABOUT DEMOCRACY...: »