April 21, 2007
THE REVOLUTION ROLLS ON:
Bush gains support for new approach on global food aid (Celia W. Dugger, April 21, 2007, international Herald Tribune)
It was here in Kansas City, at the 2005 food aid conference, that the Bush administration pushed for a fundamental change that would have diminished profits to domestic agribusiness and shipping companies. It proposed allowing a quarter of the Food for Peace budget to be used to buy food in poor countries near hunger crises, rather than buying only U.S.-grown food that had to be shipped across oceans.And Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns spoke at the conference on Wednesday to make the administration's case for the same idea, contending that such a policy would speed delivery, improve efficiency and save many lives.
Congress in each of the past two years killed the proposal, which was opposed by agribusiness and shipping interests who stood to lose business, even as it won support from liberal Democrats like Representatives Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Earl Blumenauer of Oregon.
But there are signs that the frozen politics of the issue are beginning to thaw, especially as evidence of flaws in the current aid system mounts.
Posted by Orrin Judd at April 21, 2007 5:21 PM
I must be slow on the uptake here, but if we didn't buy food in the poor countries to be distributed in the poor countries where would their food otherwise go? Shouldn't our purpose be to supplement the food supply a country has to distribute by adding to their supplies, rather than sending them money?
Posted by: Genecis at April 22, 2007 6:08 PMHunger isn't a function of too little food.
Posted by: oj at April 22, 2007 7:32 PM