January 17, 2006
I, HUMBLE DOCTOR TO THE PLANET...:
The Earth is about to catch a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years: Each nation must find the best use of its resources to sustain civilisation for as long as they can ( James Lovelock, 16 January 2006, Independent)
This article is the most difficult I have written and for the same reasons. My Gaia theory sees the Earth behaving as if it were alive, and clearly anything alive can enjoy good health, or suffer disease. Gaia has made me a planetary physician and I take my profession seriously, and now I, too, have to bring bad news.The climate centres around the world, which are the equivalent of the pathology lab of a hospital, have reported the Earth's physical condition, and the climate specialists see it as seriously ill, and soon to pass into a morbid fever that may last as long as 100,000 years. I have to tell you, as members of the Earth's family and an intimate part of it, that you and especially civilisation are in grave danger.
Our planet has kept itself healthy and fit for life, just like an animal does, for most of the more than three billion years of its existence. It was ill luck that we started polluting at a time when the sun is too hot for comfort. We have given Gaia a fever and soon her condition will worsen to a state like a coma. She has been there before and recovered, but it took more than 100,000 years. We are responsible and will suffer the consequences: as the century progresses, the temperature will rise 8 degrees centigrade in temperate regions and 5 degrees in the tropics.
Much of the tropical land mass will become scrub and desert, and will no longer serve for regulation; this adds to the 40 per cent of the Earth's surface we have depleted to feed ourselves.
Curiously, aerosol pollution of the northern hemisphere reduces global warming by reflecting sunlight back to space. This "global dimming" is transient and could disappear in a few days like the smoke that it is, leaving us fully exposed to the heat of the global greenhouse. We are in a fool's climate, accidentally kept cool by smoke, and before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.
By failing to see that the Earth regulates its climate and composition, we have blundered into trying to do it ourselves, acting as if we were in charge.
Boy, haven't been this scared since Malthus/Darwin/Ehrlich/etc.... warned about diminishing resources and survival pressures....
The great thing about this sort of nonsense is that it discredits sciencism generally. Michael Crichton's amusing, if pedantic, State of Fear has one hilarious section where he demonstrates, probably too well for his own broader purposes, that scientists arrive at whatever result they choose to: "All that matters is that hundreds of studies prove again and again that expectations determine outcome. People find what they think they'll find.
Anthropomorphicising a planet does seem a tad eccentric. A projection too far.
Posted by: ghostcat at January 17, 2006 9:46 PMIronically there was no warning prior to the arrival of the giant hyperlink.
Posted by: Carter at January 17, 2006 9:50 PMLovelock reminds me of Lloyd Bridges jumping out of the control tower after sniffing too much glue in "Airplane!"
Posted by: John at January 17, 2006 10:06 PMA little advice dude,
If your name is Lovelock, you should be trying to keep out of the public eye, not in it.
Anyone else think that this guy's loony theories are the result of mericless beatings in elementary school?
Posted by: Jim in Chicago at January 17, 2006 10:21 PMStrangely enough, now that the giant hyperlink is gone, I kind of miss it.
"This "global dimming" is transient and could disappear in a few days like the smoke that it is, leaving us fully exposed to the heat of the global greenhouse. We are in a fool's climate, accidentally kept cool by smoke"
I suddenly feel better about setting fire to all those tires.
Posted by: Carter at January 17, 2006 10:37 PMThis was in a real newspaper?!
Posted by: JAB at January 17, 2006 10:48 PMSo pretty soon we'll be down to "a few breeding pairs", eh? That sounds kind of kinky. Plus you have to figure that women are a lot tougher than men, so there are bound to be some extra chicks, no? This is basically Hugh Hefner's version of the Apocalypse.
Posted by: joe shropshire at January 17, 2006 11:12 PM"A few breeding pairs, eh?" I seem to remember hearing about that one once before, long ago . . .
"Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?"
"Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature."
"I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor."
Posted by: Mike Morley at January 17, 2006 11:35 PMI look forward to global warming, if only because I recently saw Altman's Quintet. And I like snow.
Posted by: RC at January 18, 2006 12:25 AMThis article drips with such immense self-importance it's staggering. Why does this idiot thing a 5 degree increase in temperature wouldn't extend the verdant, tropical areas of the earth? Areas that are desert and scrub, like most of Australia, aren't that way because they are hot. What a tool.
Posted by: Amos at January 18, 2006 2:34 AM"this adds to the 40 per cent of the Earth's surface we have depleted to feed ourselves..."
This seems like a dubious percentage.
Well, if true, we won't have to worry about the next ice age.
Posted by: Genecis at January 18, 2006 10:22 AMIt was ill luck that we started polluting at a time when the sun is too hot for comfort.
In other words, ignore the other causes for global warming behind the curtain!
Posted by: Timothy at January 18, 2006 1:30 PMHave stopped making Friday the 13th movies? Are they going to stop printing end of the world books? Same thing, cheap thrills.
Posted by: Robert Schwartz at January 18, 2006 9:55 PM