January 8, 2005

WHO'S GOING TO PRY ALL THOSE RACHEL CARSON ICONS OFF THE DASHBOARDS OF VOLVOS?:

It's Time to Spray DDT (NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF, 1/08/05, NY Times)

If the U.S. wants to help people in tsunami-hit countries like Sri Lanka and Indonesia - not to mention other poor countries in Africa - there's one step that would cost us nothing and would save hundreds of thousands of lives.

It would be to allow DDT in malaria-ravaged countries.

I'm thrilled that we're pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into the relief effort, but the tsunami was only a blip in third-world mortality. Mosquitoes kill 20 times more people each year than the tsunami did, and in the long war between humans and mosquitoes it looks as if mosquitoes are winning. [...]

In the 1950's, 60's and early 70's, DDT was used to reduce malaria around the world, even eliminating it in places like Taiwan. But then the growing recognition of the harm DDT can cause in the environment - threatening the extinction of the bald eagle, for example - led DDT to be banned in the West and stigmatized worldwide. Ever since, malaria has been on the rise.

The poor countries that were able to keep malaria in check tend to be the same few that continued to use DDT, like Ecuador. Similarly, in Mexico, malaria rose and fell with the use of DDT. South Africa brought back DDT in 2000, after a switch to other pesticides had led to a surge in malaria, and now the disease is under control again. The evidence is overwhelming: DDT saves lives.


Quite good except for repeating the canard that DDT was resposible for the decline of bald eagle populations, which was instead a simple function of hunting and the like.

Posted by Orrin Judd at January 8, 2005 6:23 AM
Comments

I'm a sponsor for my Middle School's Youth Association and the State-YMCA holds an annual United Nations Assembly (mock UN) in Louisville every March. So far in the last three (I believe) mock UNs, at least one proposal presented has been to re-continue the use of DDT in malaria-ravaged countries. It usually gets shot down for the very reasons stated above...responsible for the deaths of bald eagles, etc. One counter argument was that DDT made the eggshells of raptors thinner, thus making breeding near impossible. But at least the 12 and 13 year olds are discussing the issue.

Posted by: Bartman at January 8, 2005 9:36 AM

My son lives in Montpellier, France. When we visited a couple of summers ago, we were delighted by the absence of mosquitoes and when we inquired, he replied that they spray with DDT because they want to attract the tourist trade to their beaches. I didn't comment about the absence of birds.

I know it's redundant, but hypocrisy, thy name is France.

Posted by: erp at January 8, 2005 11:41 AM

'Mosquitoes kill 20 times more people each year ...'

Mosquitoes don't kill people; diseases borne by mosquitoes kill people.

Posted by: old maltese at January 8, 2005 3:48 PM

guns don't kill people....

Posted by: oj at January 8, 2005 5:02 PM
« LOOKING LIKE THE NORWEGIAN BLUE: | Main | CAN'T VERY WELL RUN WITH DEBT LIKE THAT: »