December 21, 2004

WOBBLY EYED:

Make No Mistake (DAVID BROOKS, 12/21/04, NY Times)

It was a series of unfortunate events. [...]

It was unfortunate that Bush gave that speech on June 24, 2002, dismissing Yasir Arafat as a man who would never make peace. After all, the Europeans protested, while Arafat might be flawed, he was the embodiment of the Palestinian cause.

It was a mistake to build the security fence, which the International Court of Justice called a violation of international law. Never mind that the fence cut terror attacks by 90 percent. It was the moral equivalent of apartheid, the U.N. orators declared.

It was a mistake to assassinate the leaders of Hamas, which took credit for the murders of hundreds of Israelis. France, among many other nations, condemned these attacks and foretold catastrophic consequences.

It was unfortunate that President Bush never sent a special envoy to open talks, discuss modalities and fine-tune the road map. As Milton Viorst wrote in The Washington Quarterly, this left "slim prospects" for any progress toward peace.

It was unfortunate that Bush sided openly with Sharon during their April meetings in Washington, causing the European Union to condemn U.S. policy. It was unfortunate that Bush kept pushing his democracy agenda. After all, as some Israelis said, it is naïve to export democracy to Arab soil.

Yes, these were a series of unfortunate events. And yet here we are in this hopeful moment. It almost makes you think that all those bemoaners and condemners don't know what they are talking about. Nothing they have said over the past three years accounts for what is happening now.

It almost makes you think that Bush understands the situation better than the lot of them. His judgments now look correct. Bush deduced that Sharon could grasp the demographic reality and lead Israel toward a two-state solution; that Arafat would never make peace, but was a retardant to peace; that Israel has a right to fight terrorism; and that Sharon would never feel safe enough to take risks unless the U.S. supported him when he fought back.

Bush concluded that peace would never come as long as Palestine was an undemocratic tyranny, and that the Palestinians needed to see their intifada would never bring triumph.


Meanwhile, no one was more reliable for misunderstanding the course of these developments than the neocons and no one had more to do with their course than Natan Sharansky.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 21, 2004 7:14 AM
Comments

Orrin,
I read this post in today's podcast. Every day I create a 10-15 minute MP3 of what everyone is talking about in the BLogosphere. Today I talk about the Brooks column in the NYTimes, and your comments on it. Give it a listen if you have the time. Subscribe if you want, and every program will be automatically downloaded to your portable MP3 player or iPod.
Charlie.

Posted by: Charlie Quidnunc at December 21, 2004 11:56 AM

iPod?

Posted by: oj at December 21, 2004 1:47 PM
« PARTISAN AND UNILATERAL, BUT EFFECTIVE: | Main | »