December 18, 2004

THE YEAR OF LIVING DEMOCRATICALLY:

Asian Democracy Gains Ground in 2004 (Heda Bayron, 17 December 2004, VOA News)

More than a billion Asians cast their votes this year to elect new leaders. Analysts say these exercises show that democracy is flourishing in the region. Nevertheless, for many people, democracy remains an elusive goal.

Asia has been on the path of democratization since the mid-1980s. People did away with dictatorships in the Philippines, Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand, and much later, Indonesia.

The region continued to see major gains in democracy this year. Elections were held in seven Asian countries and in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

Indonesia held its first direct presidential elections. The orderly transition of power in Southeast Asia's most populous nation, disproved predictions six-years ago that Indonesia would disintegrate without the authoritarian leadership of former president Suharto.

Afghanistan also held landmark presidential elections - this, after years of war and then rule by the theocratic and restrictive Taleban. Though far from peaceful, experts say the election was a major step in the country's rehabilitation.

Major ballots also took place in Mongolia, Malaysia, the Philippines, India, and Australia.


Old enough to remember why the inscrutable Asiatics were supposed to be less inclined to freedom than us white folk? Like the Eastern Europeans before them and the Arabs now.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 18, 2004 3:53 PM
Comments

Nations with vast amounts of illiteracy cannot have free elections of any meaningful kind, so it always galls me to see India referred to as 'the world's largest democracy.' The same goes for Indonesia.

Posted by: Bart at December 19, 2004 6:29 AM

It's no big deal--S. Africa just used little party symbols and fols understood them fine.

Posted by: oj at December 19, 2004 8:32 AM

South Africa is a democracy? That's news to me. It looks like an inept one-party military dictatorship with populist/socialist/Marxist rhetoric and a kleptocratic ruling class, Peronism in blackface.

Posted by: Bart at December 19, 2004 11:42 AM

The two aren't mutually exclusive--look at France.

Posted by: oj at December 19, 2004 11:57 AM

French people are certainly literate, perhaps too literate. Tragically, they too often believe what they read.

The French ruling elite is certainly kleptocratic but it is a multiparty democracy where the government does alternate from right to left, if not necessarily ever leaving the hands of Enarques.

Military it is not.

OTOH, the ANC is not likely to relinquish power any time soon and would certainly revert to Mugabe tactics were they to become unpopular at the polling booth.

BTW, there is probably no one for whom I have less sympathy than White South Africans and Rhodesians, happy to lord it over the Black majority but incapable of fighting to keep their position at the top and unwilling to do the work themselves. They are what the Confederates would have been if they had been girlymen.

Posted by: Bart at December 19, 2004 12:22 PM

The Afrikaaners served our purposes. There was no way we could leave the Cape and Africa's minerals in charge of black governments during WWII or WWIII.

Posted by: oj at December 19, 2004 12:40 PM

OJ, in that you are partially correct. However, the South African state was a cruel hoax. If the Whites didn't want to give Blacks political power, they should have been willing to do the work themselves, while forcing the Black population onto areas of the region they did not want. If they wanted to have the Blacks do the work, they needed to give them political power. If they wanted to hold all the political power, then they could have fought for it. The ANC was little more than a ragtag groups of criminals, and if the Whites had decided to forego Black labor, they could have been dealt with in a matter of days.

Cote d'Ivoire was in the hands of a Black government and was certainly friendly to America under Houphouet-Boigny. The former Belgian Congo was under a Black government and we got what we needed out of there. Liberia was essentially our colony.

Posted by: Bart at December 19, 2004 2:11 PM

Bart:

They were too decent to fight for it. Democratic rhetoric always trumps power politics in the long run. That's why all our authoritarian allies evolved quickly into democracies--Spain, Chile, the Philippines, S. Korea, Taiwan, S. Africa, etc.

Posted by: oj at December 19, 2004 4:48 PM

Other than South Africa all the others developed a significant educated middle class capable of avoiding the loopy excesses of Marxism, although Filipino elections are pretty embarassing.

The Afrikaners were simply cowardly and effete.

Posted by: Bart at December 19, 2004 5:19 PM
« SADIE HAWKINS DAY COMES EARLY: | Main | NOW HE'S GIVING US GIFTS?: »