December 29, 2004
THE RED CITY:
One-third moved out of CHA ghettos (KATE N. GROSSMAN, December 29, 2004, Chicago Sun-Times)
Five years into the Chicago Housing Authority's 10-year plan to overhaul public housing, one-third of the people that once lived in CHA high-rise ghettos have moved out.About half the 25,000 units the CHA promised to rehab or rebuild by 2010 are done. And the agency has increased funding to help families meet stiff new work requirements to qualify to live in mixed-income developments.
The agency's "Plan for Transformation," CEO Terry Peterson says, is taking shape.
"Without a doubt there was skepticism" when we started, said Peterson, who has headed the CHA since 2000. "But I said from Day One we would keep our promises."
But even Peterson acknowledges the going hasn't been easy, and that finishing the plan won't be any easier. [...]
"Some of the hardest work is still outstanding, absolutely," said Robin Snyderman, housing director for the Metropolitan Planning Council. "But it's appropriate that the time was taken to do the thorough planning and find the partners. . . . There's a lot of blood, sweat and tears going into this."
And the foundation is there, Snyderman noted. Handsome new town houses and three-flats are sprouting up at nearly every redevelopment site, including some of the most notorious projects such as the Robert Taylor Homes and Cabrini-Green.
And despite fears otherwise, reputable private developers are building these communities, the city is pitching in with new streets and parks, and middle-income families are lining up to rent the units, drawn by good locations, reasonable rents and strict rules.
This week, nine years after planning began, the first families moved into Oakwood Shores, a collection of attractive brick three-flats near 38th and Ellis on the South Side built to replace three CHA sites. The buildings, with decorative stonework and wrought-iron fences, stand on the footprint of several demolished high-rise eyesores.
"This is unbelievable," Wanda Lee said Tuesday as she marveled at the new white carpeting, stove and refrigerator in her apartment. Lee, a former Madden Park resident, and her four children moved in Monday night.
At first, she was skeptical. "I really didn't believe they would build anything," she said.
But now Lee, 28, a single mom on public aid, hopes the move will start a new chapter in her life: "I want to go on to bigger and better things because we have a nice place. It's a new start for me."
The key will be to make them owners of such places, with all the responsibility and opportunity that entails, rather than renters. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 29, 2004 8:33 AM
Kind of makes you wonder what would happen if they could own their kids' education. If we could sell Ted Kennedy on the idea, it might get done.
Posted by: JimGooding at December 29, 2004 11:13 AMJim:
They do:
http://www.brothersjudd.com/blog/archives/015585.html
Posted by: oj at December 29, 2004 11:28 AMIf you close a low-performing school in the neighborhood, and replace it with a charter that will, hopefully, be better, that's still not ownership. Ownership of education is portability of choice, money directed solely by the parents: vouchers.
Posted by: JimGooding at December 29, 2004 1:05 PMAh, the perfect as enemy of the good....
Posted by: oj at December 29, 2004 1:08 PMSo argue entrenched union opponents of vouchers.
Vouchers are only perfect if there's an unlimited supply of great schools that can address a vast spectrum of learning styles/disabilities. Vouchers are not perfect, just the next logical step away from managed incompetence, a step teh GOP leadership refuses to take in any meaningful way.
Posted by: JimGooding at December 29, 2004 2:01 PMSchools? If you had a voucher why would you send your kid to school? Get together with two neighbors and hire a teacher of your own.
Posted by: oj at December 29, 2004 3:28 PMThe problem is that thanks to a century or so of centralized education by incarceration, it's become hard to think of any other way. But why shouldn't a small group of people be able to use vouchers to buy all the teaching materials and a tutor or two they might need, and skip the school/prison system? (And require the demonstration of a minimum of results, or is that too intrusive of gov't for Libertarian fundamentalists?)
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 29, 2004 7:28 PMNPR had a story this morning about the murder rate in Chicago plunging this year to a 39 year low.
Posted by: David Cohen at December 29, 2004 7:45 PM