December 26, 2004

THE MORALITY OF DEMOGRAPHIC CALCULATIONS (via Mike Daley):

Bigotry's harvest (Caroline Glick, 12/24/04, THE JERUSALEM POST)

The moral dimension of the proposed destruction of Israeli communities in Gaza and northern Samaria is one that has received scant attention over the past year since Sharon adopted the Labor Party's plan of retreat and expulsion as his own. Indeed, although it was one of the implicit assumptions of the 1993 Oslo process, the fact that a precondition for a final peace accord with the PLO was that all Jewish residents of Judea, Samaria and Gaza would be ethnically cleansed has rarely been mentioned. As for Sharon's withdrawal plan for Gaza and northern Samaria, everyone from US National Security Council Middle East Adviser Elliott Abrams to Labor Party leader Shimon Peres to Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak to British Prime Minister Tony Blair have all noted that the plan, if enacted, will provide a precedent for the destruction of all or most of the remaining Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria with their population of some 250,000 Israelis.

THIS WEEK, the public debate shifted its attention for the first time in 11 years to the question of whether it is moral to ethnically cleanse the territories of their Jewish residents and force all Israelis to live within the cease-fire lines from 1949. With the publication of an open letter from Binyamin Regional Council head Pinhas Wallerstein calling for mass civil disobedience against the proposed ethnic cleansing of Jews from Gaza and northern Samaria, the question of the morality of the plan has exploded onto the public stage.

Wallerstein wrote, "The government of Israel has approved the first reading of the immoral law that paves the way for the crime of the displacement of Jews from their homes. The law does not provide those targeted for expulsion with even the minimal human right – to oppose their displacement from their homes. I call for the public to break the expulsion law and to be ready to pay the price of going to jail."

Wallerstein's call, which was adopted by the entire organized leadership of the Israeli communities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza, caused some dozen members of Knesset to sign a declaration stating that they will oppose the enactment of the law even at the price of losing their parliamentary immunity from prosecution and going to jail.

Gaza residents caused a public outcry when they taped orange Stars of David to their clothes this week. The hue and cry of the politicians on the Right and on the Left said that in using symbols from the Holocaust they were besmirching the memory of the victims of Europe's genocide of its Jews. It would seem that those who decried the residents' symbol have forgotten what a metaphor is. The point was not that Sharon is Adolf Hitler or that Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz is Adolf Eichmann. The point of the protest was that Israel is the first Western state to call for the forced removal of Jews from their homes, simply because they are Jews, since the Holocaust and that there is something morally atrocious about the notion that for peace to come –- to Israel and to those bombing Israel –- it is necessary for entire regions to be rendered Judenrein. And again, as leaders in Israel and throughout the world have stated, the expulsion from Gaza and northern Samaria is simply a preview of coming attractions for what awaits those who live in Judea and the rest of Samaria.


There's a simple enough solution--let these unbigoted settlers, who care only about their homes, stay and be governed by Palestinians.

Posted by Orrin Judd at December 26, 2004 10:15 AM
Comments

The so-called Palestinians would massacre them in an instant. There isn't even the merest hint of a concept of liberty or religious tolerance in their mental universe. Just look what they did to Rachel's Tomb.

There is no reason to think they would behave any differently than they did in 1929 when they massacred the Jewish community of Hebron, which had been there for about 3000 years.

Posted by: Bart at December 26, 2004 11:36 AM

Yes, so it's not about getting a chance to defend their homes is it?

Posted by: oj at December 26, 2004 11:58 AM

Heard on the radio this afternoon that the first settlement has agreed to be relocated.

(By the way, contrary to the article, nobody thinks that Israel is going to revert to the '49 voters.)

Posted by: David Cohen at December 26, 2004 5:22 PM

'49 borders, of course.

Posted by: David Cohen at December 26, 2004 5:28 PM

No Jews in Judea - boggles the mind.

Posted by: Sandy P at December 26, 2004 11:08 PM

The West is going to have to deal with Islam eventually. Most probably in the same way that the US dealt with the American Plains Indians.

Posted by: ray at December 27, 2004 9:07 AM
« LET NUKES DETER NUCLEAR ASPIRATIONS: | Main | HAVE THEY HEARD OF THE INTERNET?: »