December 21, 2004
THE METRIC LANGUAGE:
‘Denglish’ is on the march (Richard Bernstein, December 21, 2004, The New York Times)
Not long ago, the airline Lufthansa made a bit of news when it changed its slogan from "There's No Better Way to Fly," in English, to the German, "Alles für diesen Moment," or "Everything for this Moment."What was the German national carrier doing with an English slogan aimed at its German clientele in the first place?
Whatever it was doing, many companies in German have used English, or some mishmash of German and English - the not very beautiful term for this is Denglish, a combination of Deutsche and English - to appeal to their German customers. [...]
[T]he news here in the land of Goethe, Schiller and Thomas Mann is that Denglish is on the march, and, as always, there are people who find it amusing, and others who find it sort of tragic.
Thousands of languages are going the way of the dodo--there's no reason to believe the Germans won't take theirs with them to the beckoning grave. Posted by Orrin Judd at December 21, 2004 8:09 AM
OJ: "beckoning grave"! mornings are your blogging peak time
Posted by: JimGooding at December 21, 2004 8:15 AMIsn't there a saying, "To the Victor Belongs the Spoils." We get to pick which language we want to use and the rest of the world can sign on or miss out.
Our son is a physicist. Traditionally, scientific papers were published in German and French. Now they're in English. English is the lingua franca of science, business, air traffic controllers, probably lots of other areas too.
Smart people all over the world make sure their kids learn how to speak English.
computer programs.
Posted by: oj at December 21, 2004 8:59 AMAs long as we're coining ugly words, let's make up one as ugly as possible: Deutsche-glish. Sounds like a cat coughing up a hairball with shreds of a Nietzsche essay mixed in.
Posted by: Tom at December 21, 2004 9:50 AMLanguages change all the time unless you have an Academie Francaise telling you what can and cannot be in your language. This is nothing new, and English has been the beneficiary of such organic change probably more than any other, with large numbers of words from Latin, French and German and German dialects among countless others.
The use of the word 'moment' by a German is of no more moment or 'Blick' for that matter than the use of the word 'Glockenspiel' by an Anglophone.
Posted by: Bart at December 21, 2004 10:01 AMI don't know why this is such a big deal; we've been doing this for centuries. I don't know who said it originally, but "English doesn't borrow from other languages. English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over, and goes through their pockets for loose grammar."
Putting it another way, if you speak English, you're actually speaking an amalgamation of several languages.
Posted by: Roy Jacobsen at December 21, 2004 10:24 AMJust think of English as open source software that anyone is free to add their words and phrases to, and then if it catches on with the general population it becomes part of the main language code. So if French or German dies off, a few key words will survive on within English, taking their place next to other exhalted terms like "bling-bling".
Posted by: John at December 21, 2004 10:58 AMHow many people say "Gesundheit" when someone sneezes? At least, everyone in the Midwest does. I didn't even know what it actually meant until I started taking German classes.
Posted by: Chris Durnell at December 21, 2004 11:24 AMIf it happens, it will probably take several hundred years for German to pass.
Keep in mind that if an English speaker from three hundred years ago were to suddenly appear and strike up a conversation, you would scarcely be able to understand.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at December 21, 2004 12:04 PMJeff:
Really?
I was able to understand 18th century stuff like Wealth of Nations and Locke's work quite easily.
Posted by: Ali Choudhury at December 21, 2004 12:17 PMLeft unfettered, language is one of the purest iterations of an efficient market.
Posted by: John Resnick at December 21, 2004 12:33 PMPrinting and literacy standardized the language so that change is actually far slower than it used to be. The change from Chaucer to Shakespeare(250 years) is far greater than from Shakespeare(400 years) to the present day.
Posted by: Bart at December 21, 2004 12:53 PMWe read Chaucer in Middle English in High School.
Whan that Abrill with his shoure souchte, the drocht of Marche hath perced to the roote and bathed every veyne in swich liquore, of which vertu engendered is the fleur.
It's as clear as any academic paper explaining it.
Posted by: oj at December 21, 2004 1:47 PMSo in what language was "Finnegan's Wake" written?
Posted by: Raoul Ortega at December 21, 2004 2:22 PMRaoul:
The point of it is that it be incomprehensible:
http://www.brothersjudd.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/reviews.detail/book_id/991/
Posted by: oj at December 21, 2004 2:38 PMA lot of good points already made above, one of the best by Roy J. English was always an absorbtive language. It joined threads from various sources, and conitues to pick up words from everywhere with shall we say, merry abandon.
This adaptabilty is almost the definition of evolutionary superiority from a Spencerian viewpoint. English what works and throws it into its linguistic arsenal. We like a slavic word for artificial worker? It's ours. A Tagalog word for the hinterland? Ditto.
What we are seeing throughout the world is an accereration of the process of linguistic adaption through technology. Will there be some additions to English as a result of this? Of course, just as there were as a result of the Roman and Norman conquests. Do we mind? Not at all.
English will continue to adapt and prosper, and the languages stuck in the past, French, German, Arabic, "Ebonics," and all the rest, will just sort of sputter along, every now and then winking out of existence.
Posted by: Lou Gots at December 21, 2004 3:56 PMAli:
Perhaps my several hundred year notion was a bit short, but try reading any Shakespeare. Then imagine having to understand it spoken, probably in an accent you have never heard.
Lou:
Well said. But English will do the same, only its speakers will never realize it.
Posted by: Jeff Guinn at December 22, 2004 6:23 AMJeff,
If you try speaking Shakespeare in a Cockney accent, not unlike Michael Caine's, you will get the flavor of what Shakespeare's English was supposed to sound like. If you can visualize what that sounds like, Shakespeare is actually quite easy.
Germans, unlike the French, are not afraid of neo-logisms.
Posted by: Bart at December 22, 2004 6:59 AMBeowulf is a great read in Old English.
Posted by: Dave W. at December 23, 2004 10:24 AM