September 4, 2004

MANDATE SQUARE GARDEN:

Short fuse betrays Kerry (Jim Wooten, 9/5/04, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution)

In expression and demeanor, Bush is the American ideal, the man next door who rises to the occasion, who finds his resolve in our condition. And despite the stress of crisis leadership, he retains a sense of humor about himself. He's not an easy target for angry Democrats who despise him.

Rising to the challenge to address domestic issues, too, Bush laid out an ambitious agenda with a common theme: slowly weaning the country from over-reliance on government by encouraging greater self-reliance and by rewarding individuals for being responsible.

It's an ambitious agenda that, like the war on terrorism, will be completed by his successors. But there's no denying his agenda is the reflection of a vision.

"In all these proposals, we seek to provide not just a government program, but a path, a plan to greater opportunity, more freedom and more control over your own life."

Liberals hear that as conservative jibberish. They're wrong.

It may take it as long as it took to win the Cold War, but George W. Bush has a domestic and a peace agenda as grand as Ronald Reagan's.


Except for a couple of real cranks unreconciled to the fact that deficits don't matter, it seems safe to say that Ronald Reagan is the sine qua non of modern conservatism. It's instructive then that President Bush, besides securing more legislative and executive achievements, has rolled the dice on the 2002 midterm and won and is now going for a mandate for significant further reform and will certainly make an effort to bring in a bigger congressional majority with him. one of the best early essays on Mr. Bush came from a surprising source, Bill Keller of the NY Times, and it was called Reagan's Son. the possibility exists though that Mr. Bush will surpass his political father just as he has his biological.

Posted by Orrin Judd at September 4, 2004 8:19 AM
Comments

"Except for a couple of real cranks unreconciled to the fact that deficits don't matter,..."

Count me among those cranks. Government spending has to be paid for sooner or later. Doing it later costs much more, because of interest. And the illusion of easy money leads people to spend more.

There are good reasons to go into debt, to pay for things that are very--but not infinitely--expensive. For a family, that's things like a house or an education. For the US federal goverment that's things like the costs of a war, or a recession, or a major financial disaster like the S&L bailout. And of course right now we've got a war and the tail of a recession, but down the road we've got to get what we want from government and what we're willing to pay for into balance.

Posted by: Bill Woods at September 4, 2004 4:59 PM

Bill:

If you were going to live another two hundred years would you rush to pay off your mortgage?

Posted by: oj at September 4, 2004 5:29 PM

And roads. And bridges. Always go into debt to pay for roads and bridges.

Posted by: David Cohen at September 4, 2004 11:00 PM
« PUT UP OUR DUKE: | Main | THE LEFT'S FINAL STAND: »