May 19, 2008
FUNDAMENTAL FLAWS:
A Communist-Made Disaster (GORDON G. CHANG, May 16, 2008, NY Sun)
In Internet chat rooms some are asking why only buildings for officials survived the quake. The attention on substandard construction has been focused largely on schools because of the failure of the Juyuan Middle School in Dujiangyan, close to the epicenter, where about 1,000 students were trapped.Posted by Orrin Judd at May 19, 2008 8:18 AMChildren also were buried in schools in Gansu province and Chongqing. The online chatter among Chinese had reached such a point that the Beijing official in charge of disaster relief, Wang Zhenyao, felt compelled to cite the collapse of a government compound in Beichuan county in Sichuan to refute the notion that only schools were constructed poorly.
Schools have been hard hit because of the central government's tactical mistakes. For example, Beijing, seeking to relieve crushing financial burdens on peasants, abolished the centuries-old agricultural tax. Yet the central government did not adequately compensate localities with other revenue. And to make matters worse, Beijing then required schools to provide compulsory education for all children.
Without revenue, officials skimped on construction, even refusing to pay contractors. "Subcontractors are often forced to factor in the risk of not getting paid by compromising quality and using substandard materials," said a rural education consultant in Beijing, Liang Xiaoyan, as reported in the South China Morning Post. And as one angry Sichuan resident said about the Juyuan Middle School in an Agence France-Presse report, "I'll tell you why the school collapsed. It was shoddily built. Someone wanted to save money."
In these circumstances, townships and villages could not meet normal building standards, much less ones for earthquakes. And Beijing did not require the strengthening of older structures to meet a known danger in Sichuan, the area in China most vulnerable to tremors. In view of all these factors, it was only a matter of time before Sichuan schoolchildren would perish. A geologist by training, Premier Wen should have known this.
Yet the school deaths were the result of more than just policy errors — they occurred because of the fundamental flaws of communism. First, officials did not have sufficient resources to build safe schools because many of them were skimming public funds or diverting them to other uses.
Corruption is inherent in communist political systems, and this disease is particularly prevalent in rural areas like Dujiangyan, where local Party bosses are often beyond the supervision of higher-ups. Second, the Party's traditional disregard for the nation's people — no other organization in history has been directly responsible for more unnatural deaths, perhaps as many as 50 million — meant that children were ultimately considered expendable.
Finally, the country's unaccountable political system did not permit the Chinese people to demand safer structures. If China had a free press, for example, the shocking condition of Sichuan's schools would have provoked an outcry that would inevitably have led to tougher building codes, better enforcement of rules, and more quake-resistant buildings.
A communist-made disaster.
More appropriate, a politican-made disaster. We have those here too. The lattest being Katrina. Generations of misdeeds perpetrated by corrupted local and federal officials, mostly local, had come home to roost. Of course, here we have the so-called free press to egg it on to stick it to their nemesis, any Republican, GWB in its latest incarnation. There, the press may help the govt. cover-up the true scope of the disaster, here the press exaggerate/ cover-up diasters depending on who is in the White House. There, the people are not to blame because they have no political power, here the people must share the blames because they voted for their politicians.
Posted by: ic at May 19, 2008 3:08 PMIf China had a free press, for example, the shocking condition of Sichuan's schools would have provoked an outcry that would inevitably have led to tougher building codes, better enforcement of rules, and more quake-resistant buildings.
That's funny. If China had a free press, it would be calling for more government control? Did I miss something? Doesn't China's government already control everything?
Posted by: Brandon at May 19, 2008 3:48 PMCodes aren't control.
Posted by: oj at May 19, 2008 6:20 PM