August 10, 2005

JUST WHEN WE EXCHANGED ALL OUR EUROS FOR YUAN...:

China Grows More Wary Over Rash Of Protests (Edward Cody, August 10, 2005, Washington Post)

Facing a steady rhythm of violent protests, the Chinese government is showing increased concern about stability, using caution in putting down riots around the country but warning people that violence will not be tolerated.

The fallout from a series of demonstrations has been magnified recently because of loosened restrictions on news reporting and increased use of cell phones and the Internet, even by villagers in remote areas, according to government-connected researchers and peasants involved in the protests. Although Communist Party censors try to stifle reporting on the unrest, they said, word of the incidents is transmitted at a speed previously unknown in China.

As they are more widely publicized, the violent protests have become a major issue for President Hu Jintao's government. According to Chinese academics with ties to the government, senior officials early on realized that such violence could undermine the country's economic growth -- and perhaps the party's monopoly on power -- if it continues to grow and spread.


So they can't afford either to allow the protests or to put them down and can't stop the flow of information? Anyone told the MSM?

Posted by Orrin Judd at August 10, 2005 12:58 PM
Comments

If it's true that now the 800 million peasants can talk to each other for the first time ever, then Communist China is finished.

Posted by: b at August 10, 2005 1:18 PM

The MSM has the same communication problem the PRC does. They sympathize.

Posted by: Luciferous at August 10, 2005 1:58 PM

Isn't this what's been predicted by the geeks for years? That totalitarian governments like the ChiComs are caught on the horns the communication revolution dilemma? I.e., either they stifle communications and thence economic growth, leading to the collapse of the government, or they allow communications which permits their subjects to penetrate state propaganda, leading to the collapse of the government.

Posted by: Annoying Old Guy at August 10, 2005 2:53 PM

It's the system itself that's collapsing--communications just spread the news faster and more thoroughly.

Posted by: oj at August 10, 2005 2:58 PM

China is not Communist, and if they do go down, then they're bringing us with them.

Posted by: at August 10, 2005 4:46 PM

Anonymous:

We'll not even notice.

Posted by: oj at August 10, 2005 4:48 PM

The PRC govt told American companies like Microsoft and Cisco to insert automatic censorship filters at the border egress points into the country, to keep out unwanted foreign web sites.

It's relatively easy to block Google at the water's edge. But it is nigh impossible to monitor a hundred million point-to-point communications between internal Chinese users.

Posted by: Gideon at August 10, 2005 5:08 PM

And when those 800 million aggrieved and angry people share the realization "We are many, they are few." it's show time.

Posted by: Luciferous at August 10, 2005 6:15 PM

It doesn't take 800 million - it only takes about 100,000 - 200,000 (in the right places).

Did anyone ever see if the report of a Muslim suicide bomber in Western China in mid-July was verified?

Posted by: jim hamlen at August 10, 2005 7:20 PM

Anonymous:

Is your comment ("China is not communist...") a lament?

Posted by: ratbert at August 10, 2005 7:21 PM

Gideon, a good point.

In the first 25 years of the PRC, the regime could count on enthusiastic support from millions upon millions of collaborators, informers, and true believers. Back then, most of the Chinese people really believed in the regime's promises. Even though the regime's leaders were so paranoid they found internal enemies where there were none, the far greater threats to the regime were external. There was no real internal threat because most Chinese had willingly, if foolishly, subjugated themselves to Communist rule.

Today, that trust is long gone, destroyed by decades of corruption, misrule, and bloodshed.

This was already apparent in the 1990s. Just after Tiananmen, for example, the Party ordered Beijing's work units to report which of their employees had participated in the demonstrations. In the past, the work units would have dutifully followed orders. Instead, now the work units doctored their records to protect their employees, so that the Party couldn't trace who had demonstrated. Under these conditions, the greater threat to the regime was no longer external, but internal. In a very real sense, the collaborators of the regime had become collaborators against the regime.

Over the past ten years, the internal threat has only increased. The regime's attempt to use Microsoft and Cisco as tools of repression is indeed only good against "pollution" from external threats. It's no good against the regime's internal enemy, who now happens to be the vast majority of the Chinese people.

Posted by: X at August 10, 2005 7:39 PM
« WHERE ARE THE YOBS WHEN YOU NEED THEM?: | Main | WHAT SHOULD WE DO WITH THE SURPLUS?: »