February 24, 2004

THIS MAILING BROUGHT TO YOU FOR FREE BY THE BUSH RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN (via mc):

Health Plans Boost Benefits for Seniors: Private Alternatives to Medicare Will Get Added Government Funding (SARAH LUECK, 2/24/04, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL)

Private health plans are gearing up to sweeten coverage for senior citizens -- part of an aggressive effort to lure them away from the government-run Medicare program.

Starting next month, many private plans will begin using direct mail, advertising and informational meetings to entice seniors to sign up. The main selling point is better benefits.

Currently, more than 10% of the nation's 41 million Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in such programs. The Bush administration wants to boost that number. As a result, the recent overhaul of Medicare showers $1.3 billion over the next two years on private plans that enroll Medicare beneficiaries. The law stipulates that the plans must use the money to enhance the benefits they offer senior citizens, lower the fees they charge them, or boost payments to the doctors and hospitals who treat them.

In New York, Oxford Health Plans Inc. says it will, pending federal approval, start covering $1,200 of prescription drugs per year instead of the $250 and $500 it currently offers Medicare beneficiaries. In Minnesota, the nonprofit health-maintenance organization UCare Minnesota will reduce premiums by $15 a month for most of the 26,000 seniors it covers. In Philadelphia, seniors in one of Aetna's HMO options won't have to pay a monthly premium to the plan at all, beyond what the government-run program deducts from Social Security checks.

"This is the gold rush for the insurance industry," says Robert Laszewski, a consultant with insurance-industry clients.

Whether it is a good idea for Medicare beneficiaries to enroll in private plans is one of the most heated subjects in the debate over the future of the program. Private plans typically offer more benefits than traditional Medicare; the government program doesn't cover routine physicals, for example, but many private plans do.

However, the private plans generally aren't as flexible about choice of doctors and hospitals. Medicare generally covers visits to any doctor or hospital the patient chooses. But the private Medicare plans -- known as Medicare Advantage plans -- tend to have managed-care type networks, limiting patients to certain doctors and hospitals that have agreed to discounts.

While the Bush administration and many Republicans say that increasing the number of Medicare beneficiaries in private plans will help provide better care and eventually reduce Medicare spending, Democrats argue that the program will be weakened and seniors will end up with widely differing benefits depending on where they live.


Spring approaches, bringing with it: tax refund checks, mailings about the new health care you can get, the handover in Iraq, al Qaeda roundup in Pakistan, an end to the Democratic primaries, more good economic growth news, a $170 million ad campaign from Karl Rove... This is John Kerry's high water mark.

Posted by Orrin Judd at February 24, 2004 2:16 PM
Comments

Don't count on those tax refund checks. A lot of us won't be getting a refund because of the early child credit sent out last year.

And lot's of memories are short.

Posted by: Brandon at February 24, 2004 4:23 PM

Brandon:

Have you done yours yet? You may be surprised.

Posted by: oj at February 24, 2004 4:29 PM

I don't know that mine will be representative. I was out of work for most of 2002. So our 2003 family income is double our 2002 income.

I have done mine so far, and it shows that I owe a whole bunch of money.

Posted by: Brandon at February 24, 2004 6:11 PM

A smart person tries to manage their taxes so that they pay a small amount come 15 April. (so called "safe-harbor" rules). I didn't factor in those damn cuts accurately and they have caused me to actually get a refund this year.

Let's also not forget the spectacle of Kerry & the Dems dancing around the definition of marriage, thanks to the overreaching of a few Mass. judges and a Frisco mayor.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega at February 24, 2004 7:15 PM

Got to be careful here.. very tricky timing.. you want to make sure that the American Gigolo takes out the Ambulance Chaser before you open the can of whoop ass on him. But you don't want to wait much longer either.

Remember though that nine-digit war chest will be countered by the liberal media, who will be offering the kind of support that doesn't show up on CFR disclosure sheets but it worth millions of advertisements. 60 minutes just ran a hit piece on the Patriot missle just as Kerry was being called into question for voting against it (and a few dozen other critical weapons of military design) That's the latest in a long line of fortuitous stories... Bush will need every dime of that $170M just to pull even.

Posted by: MarkD at February 24, 2004 8:16 PM

MarkD:

You discount the advantages of incumbency far too deeply, IMO.
It would be a fair race if Kerry had Bush's money; Since he doesn't, the advantage is absolutely to Bush, regardless of perceived media bias.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at February 25, 2004 1:58 AM

I agree with Mark D. The biased media has been going against Bush hammer and tongs for at least a year, ala the poll results. In fact they're ramping up the pace. I have the impression Kerry is beginning to choke on his foot. Edwards may take this in Boston. However, his dossier is empty, advantage Edwards over Kerry.

Skied yesterday with two "anyone but Bush" buddies and one was delighted with his refund. I seriously suggested he donate it to the Red Cross since he was so opposed to the Bush tax relief. I stated I doubled my donation last year. He didn't answer. I let it go.

Posted by: Genecis at February 25, 2004 12:23 PM
« FURTHER BACK: | Main | WE ALL KNOW HOW THIS STORY ENDS: »