February 21, 2004
RIDING THE DRAGON:
The Man Who Would Be Khan: A new breed of American soldier—call him the soldier-diplomat—has come into being since the end of the Cold War. Meet the colonel who was our man in Mongolia, an officer who probably wielded more local influence than many Mongol rulers of yore (Robert D. Kaplan, March 2004, Atlantic Monthly)
In the early spring of 2003, as U.S. troops in Iraq were consolidating their hold over Baghdad, few people had their eyes on Mongolia. And yet what was happening at the time in that country—90 percent of whose foreign military training and assistance now comes from the United States—was critical to the extension of America's global liberal influence. "Mongolia is a vast country completely surrounded by two anti-American empires, Russia and China," S. Galsanjamts, a member of Mongolia's national-security council, told me recently. "It is therefore a symbol of the kind of independence America wants to encourage in the world." Today, more often than not, the United States is encouraging that sort of independence not by intervening militarily on a grand scale but, rather, by placing a few quietly effective officers in key locations around the globe.Last year I traveled to Ulan Bator, the capital of Mongolia, to meet Colonel Tom Wilhelm, one of the best of this new breed of American soldier-diplomats. Wilhelm's official roles at the time of my visit included serving at the U.S. embassy as the defense attaché, as the security-assistance officer, and as the liaison for the military's Pacific Command (PACOM). The embassy is a small building and somewhat less imposing than other posts, befitting the low "threat assessment" assigned to Mongolia. The country lived under virtual Soviet domination for seventy years, a generation longer than the satellite states of Eastern Europe, and public opinion is staunchly pro-American. At the time of the Iraq crisis the Mongolians staged no anti-war demonstrations. Indeed, they deployed a contingent of 175 soldiers to Baghdad last year, to help with policing efforts—a move that marked the first entry of Mongol troops into Mesopotamia since 1258, when Hulagu Khan, a grandson of Genghis Khan's, arrived and exterminated most of the population of Baghdad. [...]
Wilhelm's assignment to Ulan Bator occurred against the following backdrop: Mongolia, with one of the world's lowest population densities, is being threatened demographically by the latest of Eurasia's great historical migrations—an urban Chinese civilization is determined to move north. China—which ruled much of Mongolia from the end of the seventeenth century until the early twentieth century, during the Manchu period—covets the oil, coal, uranium, and empty grasslands of its former possession. Given that a resurgent China has already absorbed Tibet, Macao, and Hong Kong, reabsorbing Mongolia—a country that on the map looks like a big piece of territory bitten away from China—seems almost irresistibly a part of China's geopolitical intentions.
Only three full-time defense attachés serve in Ulan Bator—representing Russia, the United States, and China, the three countries with past or future imperial interests in Mongolia. Americans, of course, are uncomfortable with the idea of having or running a global empire, but that responsibility is being thrust upon them nevertheless in Mongolia as elsewhere. And unconventional men like Tom Wilhelm, largely out of sight, are the ones carrying the load and transforming the world order. I went to Mongolia to see him in action. [...]
When Wilhelm arrived in Mongolia, in 2001, U.S.-Mongolian defense relations had no focus. All that existed was a hodgepodge of unrelated aid and training programs that had not been staffed out in detail in Washington or in Ulan Bator. Mongolia's post-communist military had no realistic vision of its future. It wanted a modern air force but wasn't sure what such an air force would do, or how it would be sustained, or its aircraft maintained. Wilhelm, with the active support of Ambassador John Dinger, quickly provided a sense of purpose. He and Dinger developed a "three pillars" strategy for the country and persuaded the Mongolian military to sign on. The three pillars are:
1) Securing Mongolia's borders not against a conventional military threat from China (such security would be impossible) but against illegal border incursions, criminal activities to finance terrorism, and transnational terrorism itself, particularly by the Uighur separatists of western China. Aided by the Chechens and the broad militant Islamic network, Uighur extremists represent the future of terrorism in Central Asia.
2) Preparing the Mongolian military to play an active role in international peacekeeping, in order to raise its profile in global forums and thus provide Mongolia with diplomatic protection from its large, rapacious neighbors. The dispatch of Mongolian troops to post-Saddam Iraq elicited shrill cries of annoyance from Russia and China, but it was the first building block of this pillar.
3) Improving Mongolia's capacity to respond to natural disasters, most notably drought.
We should be on the offensive against China, not the defensive--forging a permanent allliance with places like Taiwan and Mongolia and agitating for self-determination in Tibet, Hong Kong, etc. Posted by Orrin Judd at February 21, 2004 10:51 PM
OJ:
"We should be on the offensive against China, not the defensive--forging a permanent allliance with places like Taiwan and Mongolia and agitating for self-determination in Tibet, Hong Kong, etc."
Colonel Wilhelm:
"Securing Mongolia's borders not against a conventional military threat from China (such security would be impossible) but against illegal border incursions,..[etc.]."
OJ, I would love to see Red China begging at our feet, but sometimes the resources at hand just arent enough to achieve the desired goals.
Posted by: Karl at February 21, 2004 11:59 PMKarl:
It doesn't take more than rhetoric to goad a country that so pathologically wants to believe itself important. Just pull a Reagan vs. the USSR on them--talk them into collapsing.
Posted by: oj at February 22, 2004 12:03 AMI sure hope that you're right, OJ. I really do.
Posted by: Karl at February 22, 2004 12:21 AMChina's own policies seem likely to cause wrenching internal change in the next few decades. (Again).
How long can they combine, without rebellion:
A nominally Communist central government.
An economically booming, metropolitan coast.
A dirt-poor, primarily agricultural interior, wherein the majority of Chinese live, but who are not legally allowed to migrate to the vastly richer areas to find work.
They may find just the right way to navigate the shoals, but it seems unlikely.
Posted by: Michael Herdegen at February 22, 2004 4:14 AMOJ is correct, we can cause China a lot of worry with very little expenditure of resources. Have the Mongolian leader visit the US and meet with Bush, have Bush give a speech about the "great traditions of freedom-loving Mongolians", etc., hint at a joint-defense treaty. At the same time, call their bluff on Taiwan, have the Taiwanese leader visit the US. Turn up the heat on North Korea, hint that we'll go it alone if China won't cooperate.
Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 22, 2004 11:47 AMThe article you're referencing in The Atlantic was an excellent read. What I found particularly interesting is the comment made by the Colonel Wilhelm regarding the essential role played by Christians (both evangelical and fundamentalist) in the rebuilding of the military following Vietnam.
Although I'd love to see Mongolia capable of obliterating China's military -- there's just no way that's going to happen. The only way to prevent that kind of defeat is through political means. Realistically, defeating terrorists, drug smugglers etc is the only type of thing likely to be even minimally successful. Destablization from groups who would infiltrate across the borders is a huge threat to many countries so it's a worthy cause.
-Jim.
