February 27, 2004

ONE-UPMANSHIP:

What’s the big deal, Naomi? (Sam Schulman, 2/28/04, The Spectator)

I was 27, a postgraduate student at Yale in my last term, and then, as now, a man. Unlike Naomi Wolf, I needed nothing from Prof. Bloom. I was destined for a first teaching job at Boston University. I even had an official appointment at Yale (in Yale’s exquisitely calibrated taxonomy of humiliation) as Part-Time Acting Assistant Instructor of English.

One day, walking along Temple Street, I saw Harold ambling towards me. Taken aback, I acted on instinct — and resorted to flattery. I had heard him give a wonderful lecture at a conference on Gnostic religion a week earlier. The audience was composed primarily of scholars, but there were a few disconcerting figures in the audience who looked as if they were Magus figures escaped from the pages of an Iris Murdoch novel.

I told him that I thought his lecture was beautiful. He stopped, and regarded me with his soft, yearning eyes. ‘My dear,’ he said, ‘what a lovely thing to tell an old and tired man.’ He was 47. ‘Here — let me kiss you.’ And he stepped forward, put his arms around me, pulled me to his then ample bosom, and kissed me on the mouth.

His lips, I remember, were full. They were rather chapped with the dryness of American houses in winter, even though spring had arrived. His kiss was decisive, tender, historic — a flag planted upon new territory.

What did it mean? My personal beauty was then at its peak. My locks were golden and curly. My figure was slender — it had not been bowed and thickened with the effort of pushing too many children in strollers in too many cities. I must have been hard to resist.

And what of Professor Bloom? He was a man of vast passion. A bottle of wine was enough to make him frisky. He enjoyed my beauty, yes, but then he enjoyed everything. I remember a moment in a seminar when, about to teach Tennyson’s poem ‘Mariana’, he gazed at the reproduction of Millais’s picture with its back view of the discontented heroine. ‘I knew Mariana was supposed to be attractive,’ Harold mused, ‘but I had no conception that she was so deliciously broad in the beam.’


Posted by Orrin Judd at February 27, 2004 7:41 AM
Comments

The more I read about Bloom, the more he comes to resemble the late great Zero Mostel.

In the late '70's early '80's he published a "novel" based on mideval gnosticism. It was given a glowing review by one of his acolytes in Time or Newsweek. So, I bought it. It was unreadable. I'm not even sure if the author could have understood it.

I still want to know what Miss Wolf was thinking about, when she invited him up to her apartment.

Posted by: Robert Schwartz at February 27, 2004 1:46 PM

"[D]eliciously broad in the beam"... A man after my own heart.

Posted by: Michael Herdegen at February 27, 2004 2:37 PM

A line I wish I could have coined.

Posted by: Jason Johnson at February 27, 2004 4:44 PM

I've read Bloom's "The Western Canon", which is a very readable review of the major works of Western literature. He also wrote "The American Religion" which discusses the decidedly Gnostic character of the homegrown American religious traditions, specifically Mormonism. Both are excellent reads.

Posted by: Robert Duquette at February 27, 2004 4:52 PM
« GENTLEMEN'S AGREEMENT: | Main | BRANDED?: »